Naert I E, Bevers L, Nijs L
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University of Leuven, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology, and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Belgium.
Quintessence Int. 1993 Jun;24(6):397-403.
An alternative tooth replacement system, based on pin retention, was clinically evaluated for up to 4 years in a prospective study. Thirty-two Universal Dental Anchorage anchors, supporting 28 fixed partial prostheses in 25 patients, were placed. Most of these prostheses had a cast complete crown on one abutment; on the other abutment, the UDA anchor functioned as a support for the extension pontine. After a mean observation period of 2 years, nine anchors failed. Around five of the failed anchors, caries was present; this occurred after 2 years or more of function of the prostheses. Early failure (4/9) were registered in the first year of function and were caused by loss of retention (three) or anchor fracture (one). The periodontal condition of the UDA anchor abutment teeth was not significantly different from that of the contralateral side. The number of failures, especially the number caused by recurrent caries, is cause for concern.
在一项前瞻性研究中,对一种基于销固位的替代牙齿修复系统进行了长达4年的临床评估。植入了32个通用牙科锚固装置,为25名患者的28个固定局部义齿提供支持。这些义齿中的大多数在一个基牙上有铸造全冠;在另一个基牙上,通用牙科锚固装置作为延伸桥体的支撑。经过平均2年的观察期,9个锚固装置失效。在大约5个失效的锚固装置周围出现了龋齿;这发生在义齿功能2年或更长时间之后。早期失效(4/9)发生在功能的第一年,原因是固位丧失(3个)或锚固装置断裂(1个)。通用牙科锚固装置基牙的牙周状况与对侧无显著差异。失效的数量,尤其是复发性龋齿导致的失效数量,令人担忧。