Buxton A E, Fisher J D, Josephson M E, Lee K L, Pryor D B, Prystowsky E N, Simson M B, DiCarlo L, Echt D S, Packer D
Department of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1993 Nov-Dec;36(3):215-26. doi: 10.1016/0033-0620(93)90015-6.
This trial will significantly advance our understanding of the prognostic and therapeutic usefulness of electrophysiologic studies in patients with coronary artery disease. Several features of this trial are worth emphasizing. First, the protocol for performing programmed stimulation and serial drug testing is designed to mirror those currently in use by many practicing electrophysiologists. While practice patterns vary, the procedures used in the trial reflect what is considered "usual and standard" practice. Second, because half of the patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia will be given no antiarrhythmic therapy, we will be able to ascertain the true risk of sudden death in this patient population without the influence of these agents. Third, this trial will assess the usefulness of a method of guiding antiarrhythmic therapy (electrophysiologic testing) to reduce mortality in this high-risk population. It will not evaluate the efficacy of a specific type of antiarrhythmic therapy.
这项试验将极大地推进我们对电生理研究在冠状动脉疾病患者中的预后和治疗效用的理解。该试验的几个特点值得强调。首先,进行程序刺激和系列药物测试的方案旨在反映许多执业电生理学家目前使用的方案。虽然实践模式各不相同,但试验中使用的程序反映了被认为是“常规和标准”的做法。其次,由于一半诱导出持续性室性心动过速的患者将不接受抗心律失常治疗,我们将能够确定该患者群体在不受这些药物影响的情况下猝死的真实风险。第三,这项试验将评估一种指导抗心律失常治疗(电生理测试)方法对降低该高危人群死亡率的效用。它不会评估特定类型抗心律失常治疗的疗效。