Byar D P, Herzberg A M, Tan W Y
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Stat Med. 1993 Sep 15;12(17):1629-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121708.
Recently there has been increased interest in considering factorial designs for randomized clinical trials when one wishes to study two or more treatments. Such designs may offer impressive gains in efficiency compared with a series of trials studying one treatment at a time. This is especially true when the treatments do not interact with one another. If interactions are of special interest, factorial designs provide one sensible approach for studying them, but larger sample sizes would be required because tests for interactions have lower power than those for main effects. In trials designed to test putative agents for preventing cancer, interactions may be of less interest so that fractions of higher-order factorial designs might be appropriate. Sometimes it may not be reasonable, interesting, feasible, or ethical to study all treatment combinations required in a complete or fractional factorial design, yet one may want to preserve some of the factorial structure to increase efficiency and to aid understanding. For such situations, incomplete factorial designs are proposed. Although not all of the advantages of full factorial designs are preserved, such designs may provide reasonable compromises for certain situations.
最近,当人们希望研究两种或更多种治疗方法时,对于考虑将析因设计用于随机临床试验的兴趣日益增加。与一次研究一种治疗方法的一系列试验相比,这种设计可能在效率方面带来显著提升。当治疗方法之间不相互作用时尤其如此。如果相互作用是特别感兴趣的内容,析因设计为研究它们提供了一种合理的方法,但由于相互作用的检验功效比主效应的检验功效低,所以需要更大的样本量。在旨在测试预防癌症的假定药物的试验中,相互作用可能不太受关注,因此高阶析因设计的部分实施可能是合适的。有时,研究完全析因设计或部分析因设计所需的所有治疗组合可能不合理、无趣、不可行或不符合伦理,但人们可能希望保留一些析因结构以提高效率并有助于理解。针对此类情况,提出了不完全析因设计。尽管不能保留完全析因设计的所有优点,但此类设计可能为某些情况提供合理的折衷方案。