Willi J, Frei R, Limacher B
Psychiatrische Poliklinik, Universitätsspital in Zurich, Switzerland.
Fam Process. 1993 Sep;32(3):311-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1993.00311.x.
A central problem in couples therapy is the clients' tendency to persist in endless and fruitless alternation between attacking the partner and justifying themselves. The technique of construct differentiation described in this article has proved helpful in coping with this situation. In three clearly structured steps, the therapist explores the personal constructs of each partner in the presence of the other. Instead of concentrating in the usual way on circularity of thoughts, feelings, and behavior, the partners are hindered from interacting and are confronted by the therapist's questions concerning their own inner process, independently of that of the partner. By becoming aware of their own ambivalent constructs and those of the partner, the eagerness to convert the partner to their own point of view can be reduced, and the construct system of each partner can be enriched by the other's constructs. Construct differentiation proves especially useful in the treatment of power struggles and narcissistic collusions.
夫妻治疗中的一个核心问题是,来访者倾向于在攻击伴侣和为自己辩解之间无休止地、徒劳地交替。本文所述的建构分化技术已被证明有助于应对这种情况。治疗师分三个结构清晰的步骤,在双方在场的情况下探究每位伴侣的个人建构。伴侣们不再像往常那样专注于思想、情感和行为的循环,而是被阻止互动,并面对治疗师关于他们自身内在过程的问题,而不考虑伴侣的内在过程。通过意识到自己和伴侣矛盾的建构,将伴侣转变为自己观点的急切心情会降低,每位伴侣的建构系统也会因对方的建构而得到丰富。建构分化在处理权力斗争和自恋勾结方面特别有用。