• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

To drain or not to drain: a retrospective study of closed-suction drainage following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy.

作者信息

Jensen J K, Lucci J A, DiSaia P J, Manetta A, Berman M L

机构信息

University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Orange 92668.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Oct;51(1):46-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1244.

DOI:10.1006/gyno.1993.1244
PMID:8244174
Abstract

The records of 115 patients were reviewed following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage (IA2 to IIB) cervical cancer to determine the effectiveness of closed-suction drainage in decreasing postoperative morbidity. In Group 1 (n = 67), closed-suction (Jackson-Pratt) drains were placed bilaterally in the pelvic lymphadenectomy sites, whereas in Group 2 (n = 48), no drains were utilized. The groups were similar for mean age, tumor histology, disease stage, and preoperative serum albumin and total protein. There was no difference in the mean operative time, mean estimated blood loss, or transfusion rate. Likewise, febrile morbidity rates, incidence of pelvic cellulitis, length of postoperative ileus, and total hospital stay were similar. Group 1 had an increased rate of rehospitalization and morbidity directly related to the presence of the drains. The data suggest that prophylactic surgical drainage may not be necessary to prevent postoperative morbidity following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and on occasion contributes to postoperative complications.

摘要

相似文献

1
To drain or not to drain: a retrospective study of closed-suction drainage following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Oct;51(1):46-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1244.
2
Closed-suction drainage versus no drainage following radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB cervical cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 1995 May;57(2):232-4. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1131.
3
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.使用超声刀行全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.08.011.
4
Randomised trial of drains versus no drains following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG) study in 234 patients.根治性子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术后引流与不引流的随机试验:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织-妇科癌症小组(EORTC-GCG)对234例患者的研究
Eur J Cancer. 2007 May;43(8):1265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
5
[Analysis of postoperative complications of radical hysterectomy for 219 cervical cancer patients].219例宫颈癌患者根治性子宫切除术后并发症分析
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2006 Apr;28(4):316-9.
6
Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer.阴道根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的比较。
Gynecol Oncol. 1996 Sep;62(3):336-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0245.
7
Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌患者全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):96-102. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000268798.75353.04.
8
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.早期宫颈癌患者行全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术加淋巴结清扫术的对比:我们的经验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1316-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0342-7. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
9
Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.机器人辅助宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术:一项初步研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Feb;108(2):312-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.015. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
10
Differences in the morbidity of radical hysterectomy between gynecological oncologists.妇科肿瘤学家在根治性子宫切除术发病率方面的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Oct;51(1):39-45. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1243.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylactic and Therapeutic Usage of Drains in Gynecologic Oncology Procedures: A Comprehensive Review.妇科肿瘤手术中引流管的预防性和治疗性应用:一项综述
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 16;15(6):254. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060254.
2
Interdepartmental Spread of Innovations: A Multicentre Study of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programme.创新的跨部门传播:一项关于手术后加速康复计划的多中心研究。
World J Surg. 2018 Aug;42(8):2348-2355. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4495-z.
3
Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in women with gynaecological malignancies.
盆腔淋巴结清扫术后行腹膜后引流与不引流对预防妇科恶性肿瘤患者淋巴囊肿形成的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD007387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub4.
4
Analysis of the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes and complications after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors (GOTIC Study).FIGO IB1期宫颈癌且具有中度危险因素患者根治性子宫切除术后辅助放疗对结局和并发症影响的分析(GOTIC研究)
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 29;14(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0931-4.
5
Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies.盆腔淋巴结清扫术后行腹膜后引流与不引流对预防妇科恶性肿瘤患者淋巴囊肿形成的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 4;2014(6):CD007387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub3.
6
Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients.直肠癌患者择期前切除术术后盆腔引流及其他渗漏危险因素:978例患者的前瞻性研究
Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):9-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000150067.99651.6a.