• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨水泥翻修术后股骨部件反复无菌性松动的危险因素。

Risk factors for recurrent aseptic loosening of the femoral component after cemented revision.

作者信息

Retpen J B, Jensen J S

机构信息

University of Copenhagen, Department of Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 1993 Oct;8(5):471-8.

PMID:8245992
Abstract

A series of 160 consecutive cemented first revisions, performed from 1977 through 1988 for aseptic loosening of a primary cemented femoral component, were studied using survivorship methods with the purpose of identifying risk factors for recurrent loosening of the femoral component. Risk of recurrent loosening depended on the length of the revision stem, with a significantly increased risk of loosening if the tip of the primary stem was overbridged by the revision stem with less than one width of the femoral shaft. Risk of recurrent loosening was also related to the extension of a cement mantle, exceeding more than 2 mm, around the revision stem measured on postrevision anteroposterior radiographs. Furthermore, low age and neutral position of the revision stem were identified as risk factors for recurrent loosening of the cemented revision femoral component. An improved fixation of the cemented revision femoral component for revisions performed after 1982 could be related to the use of longer revision stems and improved cementation.

摘要

对1977年至1988年期间因初次骨水泥固定股骨假体无菌性松动而进行的160例连续骨水泥翻修手术进行了研究,采用生存分析方法以确定股骨假体再次松动的危险因素。再次松动的风险取决于翻修柄的长度,如果初次柄的尖端被翻修柄跨越的股骨宽度小于一个宽度,则松动风险显著增加。再次松动的风险还与翻修术后前后位X线片上测量的翻修柄周围骨水泥套超过2mm的延伸有关。此外,低龄和翻修柄的中立位被确定为骨水泥翻修股骨假体再次松动的危险因素。1982年后进行的骨水泥翻修股骨假体固定的改善可能与使用更长的翻修柄和改进的骨水泥固定有关。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for recurrent aseptic loosening of the femoral component after cemented revision.骨水泥翻修术后股骨部件反复无菌性松动的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 1993 Oct;8(5):471-8.
2
[Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].[在翻修全髋关节置换术中是否应系统性翻修一体式骨水泥柄?一项前瞻性评估]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008 Nov;94(7):670-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
3
[Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].[CF 30股骨柄早期无菌性松动]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Feb;74(1):59-64.
4
Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.初次全髋关节置换中磨砂表面股骨柄假体的松动模式
Saudi Med J. 2002 Oct;23(10):1187-94.
5
[Good long term results with a cemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium].[采用钛制骨水泥型直柄股骨干假体取得良好长期效果]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Sep;105(9):804-10. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0425-4.
6
Revision for aseptic stem loosening using the cemented Charnley prosthesis. A review of 351 hips.使用骨水泥型Charnley假体对无菌性假体松动进行翻修。对351例髋关节的回顾性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Jan;77(1):23-7.
7
The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals.中年体重和身体活动对早期髋关节置换翻修风险的影响:一项对1535名个体的队列研究。
Acta Orthop. 2007 Feb;78(1):99-107. doi: 10.1080/17453670610013493.
8
Staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty using rough and smooth surface femoral stems with similar design: 10-year survivorship of 48 cases.使用设计相似的粗糙和光滑表面股骨柄进行分期双侧全髋关节置换术:48例患者的10年生存率
Acta Orthop. 2005 Dec;76(6):809-14. doi: 10.1080/17453670510045417.
9
Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.芬兰关节置换登记处中年轻患者原发性骨关节炎的全髋关节置换术。4661例初次置换,随访0至22年。
Acta Orthop. 2005 Feb;76(1):28-41. doi: 10.1080/00016470510030292.
10
Early aseptic loosening of uncemented femoral components in primary total hip replacement. A review based on the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Jan;77(1):11-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Does size matter? Outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty with long or primary stems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.尺寸重要吗?使用长柄或初次柄进行翻修全髋关节置换术后的结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthroplasty. 2024 Jan 9;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00228-w.
2
Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision.长柄钛质骨水泥型股骨柄减少了严重骨量丢失和既往有翻修史患者的假体周围晚期骨折及翻修情况。
Int Orthop. 2015 Apr;39(4):639-44. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2528-2. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
3
Multiple Acetabular Revisions in THA - Poor Outcome Despite Maximum Effort.
全髋关节置换术中多次髋臼翻修术——尽管竭尽全力但效果不佳。
Open Orthop J. 2012;6:488-94. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010488. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
4
A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.模块化非骨水泥柄与骨水泥长柄假体在髋关节翻修术中的比较:来自瑞典髋关节置换登记处的基于人群的研究。
Acta Orthop. 2011 Apr;82(2):136-42. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.566145. Epub 2011 Mar 24.