Iwasa Y
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
J Theor Biol. 1993 Oct 7;164(3):373-93. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1993.1161.
According to recent data analysis of DNA sequences, the dispersion index, defined as the variance-to-mean ratio of the number of base substitutions in a lineage, is often much larger than unity, which is in conflict with simple Poisson processes assumed in the molecular clock hypothesis. In this paper, it will be shown that the dispersion index can be much larger than unity in a model in which the fitness of DNA sequences, mutation rate, and population size are all constant with time, and that moderately deleterious sequences are more abundant than the best fit sequences. Since the fixation probability of novel mutations depends on their fitness relative to the current sequence, the neutral mutation rate is enhanced once a deleterious mutation is fixed. In a simple case with two fitness classes, a large dispersion index can be produced by moderately deleterious mutations (3 < 4Ns < 6), but neither by nearly neutral (4Ns < 2) nor by strongly deleterious (4Ns > 7) mutations. Analysis of the case with 100 fitness classes shows that the dispersion index is insensitive to the population size, but greatly changes with the fitness distribution of DNA sequences. The model can explain why non-synonymous substitutions often have a larger dispersion index than synonymous substitutions.
根据最近对DNA序列的数据分析,离散指数(定义为一个谱系中碱基替换数的方差与均值之比)通常远大于1,这与分子钟假说中假设的简单泊松过程相冲突。本文将表明,在一个DNA序列的适应性、突变率和种群大小均随时间保持恒定的模型中,离散指数可以远大于1,并且中等有害序列比最适应序列更为丰富。由于新突变的固定概率取决于它们相对于当前序列的适应性,一旦一个有害突变被固定,中性突变率就会提高。在一个具有两个适应性类别的简单案例中,中等有害突变(3 < 4Ns < 6)可产生较大的离散指数,但近中性突变(4Ns < 2)和强有害突变(4Ns > 7)均不能。对具有100个适应性类别的案例分析表明,离散指数对种群大小不敏感,但会随DNA序列的适应性分布而大幅变化。该模型可以解释为什么非同义替换的离散指数通常比同义替换的大。