Tatman S M, Greene A L, Karr L C
Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto, CA 94303.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1993 Fall;23(3):188-203.
This study examined the utility of the Suicide Probability Scale (SPS) by comparing results obtained with a sample of 217 normal adolescents (M = 16.2 years) to the findings obtained in Cull and Gill's (1988) standardization effort. The present sample scored significantly higher than Cull and Gill's normative sample in SPS item, subscale, and total scores. In addition, the SPS generally failed to discriminate between the present, adolescent sample and Cull and Gill's inpatient psychiatric sample. Moreover, item-subscale correlations obtained for the present sample often differed from those reported by Cull and Gill, and factor analysis of SPS item scores failed to replicate Cull and Gill's four-factor solution. Findings suggest the need for caution when using the SPS to assess adolescent suicide potential and underscore the need for additional research regarding the instrument's efficacy in distinguishing between normal and suicidal adolescents.
本研究通过将217名正常青少年样本(平均年龄16.2岁)的测试结果与卡尔和吉尔(1988年)标准化研究中的结果进行比较,检验了自杀概率量表(SPS)的效用。当前样本在SPS项目、分量表和总分上的得分显著高于卡尔和吉尔的常模样本。此外,SPS通常无法区分当前的青少年样本和卡尔与吉尔的住院精神科样本。而且,当前样本的项目-分量表相关性常常与卡尔和吉尔报告的不同,对SPS项目得分进行的因子分析也未能重现卡尔和吉尔的四因子结构。研究结果表明,在使用SPS评估青少年自杀可能性时需谨慎,并强调有必要就该工具在区分正常青少年和有自杀倾向青少年方面的有效性开展更多研究。