• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青光眼视野中簇状缺损的评估。

An evaluation of clusters in the glaucomatous visual field.

作者信息

Mandava S, Zulauf M, Zeyen T, Caprioli J

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Dec 15;116(6):684-91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73466-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73466-x
PMID:8250069
Abstract

We used a statistical cluster analysis to analyze patterns of loss in 76 visual fields with typical glaucomatous defects to identify natural groupings of test locations in the visual field. Eleven clusters in the Octopus Program G1 (Interzeag, Inc., Northboro, Massachusetts) visual field were thus defined. In a separate population of 70 early glaucomatous and 70 age-matched normal visual fields, the local mean defects within these clusters and the global mean defect were calculated to assess their relative abilities to discriminate between the two groups. The 11 clustered mean defects collectively had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 93%; the global mean defect had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 91%. Additionally, we examined the long-term fluctuation clusters of test locations compared to the long-term fluctuation of individual test locations. Four hundred ten visual fields of 93 clinically stable eyes of 67 patients with glaucoma, as well as 210 visual fields of 105 eyes of 105 normal subjects were studied. In the stable glaucoma group, mean fluctuation of clustered test locations was 3.5 dB2, and mean fluctuation of individual test locations was 7.0 dB2. In the normal group, the respective values were 0.6 dB2 and 1.8 dB2. Cluster analysis was effective in detecting localized loss and in dampening long-term fluctuation. We studied the use of clusters in distinguishing normal from glaucomatous as well as stable from deteriorating visual fields.

摘要

我们使用统计聚类分析来分析76个具有典型青光眼性缺损的视野中的缺损模式,以识别视野中测试位置的自然分组。由此在Octopus Program G1(Interzeag公司,马萨诸塞州诺斯伯勒)视野中定义了11个聚类。在一个由70个早期青光眼视野和70个年龄匹配的正常视野组成的独立人群中,计算这些聚类内的局部平均缺损和总体平均缺损,以评估它们区分两组的相对能力。11个聚类平均缺损的总体敏感度为90%,特异度为93%;总体平均缺损的敏感度为81%,特异度为91%。此外,我们将测试位置的长期波动聚类与单个测试位置的长期波动进行了比较。研究了67例青光眼患者93只临床稳定眼睛的410个视野,以及105名正常受试者105只眼睛的210个视野。在稳定青光眼组中,聚类测试位置的平均波动为3.5 dB2,单个测试位置的平均波动为7.0 dB2。在正常组中,相应的值分别为0.6 dB2和1.8 dB2。聚类分析在检测局部性缺损和抑制长期波动方面是有效的。我们研究了聚类在区分正常视野与青光眼视野以及稳定视野与恶化视野方面的应用。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of clusters in the glaucomatous visual field.青光眼视野中簇状缺损的评估。
Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Dec 15;116(6):684-91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73466-x.
2
[Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
Ophthalmologe. 1996 Aug;93(4):420-7.
3
Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).结构与功能评估(SAFE):I. 使用标准自动视野计(SAP)和短波长自动视野计(SWAP)评估青光眼性视野缺损的标准
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;134(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01577-5.
4
Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma.青光眼视野的长期波动
Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Apr 15;113(4):396-400. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76161-6.
5
Detection of early glaucomatous progression with octopus cluster trend analysis.利用Octopus聚类趋势分析检测早期青光眼进展
J Glaucoma. 2014 Jun-Jul;23(5):269-75. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182741c69.
6
Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability.高级青光眼干预研究。2. 视野测试评分与可靠性。
Ophthalmology. 1994 Aug;101(8):1445-55.
7
Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.多焦客观视野检查法在青光眼视野缺损检测中的应用
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;133(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01294-6.
8
Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss.在半视野中存在弥漫性青光眼性结构和功能损害,但无明显的模式丧失。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;127(11):1442-8. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.196.
9
Prevalence and spatial concordance of visual field deterioration in fellow eyes of glaucoma patients.青光眼患者对侧眼视野损害的患病率及空间一致性。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;28(6):436-43. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.6.436. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
10
Value of logistic discriminant analysis for interpreting initial visual field defects.
Ophthalmology. 1997 Mar;104(3):525-31. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30280-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Smoothing Algorithms to Enhance Detection of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.平滑算法在增强青光眼视野进展检测中的疗效
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Nov 4;4(2):100423. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100423. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.
2
Prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma: existing methods and artificial intelligence.青光眼视野进展预测:现有方法和人工智能。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;67(5):546-559. doi: 10.1007/s10384-023-01009-3. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
Application of Pattern Recognition Analysis to Optimize Hemifield Asymmetry Patterns for Early Detection of Glaucoma.
应用模式识别分析优化半视野不对称模式以早期检测青光眼。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Sep 4;7(5):3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.5.3. eCollection 2018.
4
MRI Study of the Posterior Visual Pathways in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼患者视觉传导通路后部的磁共振成像研究
J Glaucoma. 2017 Feb;26(2):173-181. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000558.
5
Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR).使用逐点指数回归(PER)和逐点线性回归(PLR)增强视野预测
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 14;5(2):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.2.12. eCollection 2016 Mar.
6
Mapping glaucoma patients' 30-2 and 10-2 visual fields reveals clusters of test points damaged in the 10-2 grid that are not sampled in the sparse 30-2 grid.绘制青光眼患者的30-2和10-2视野图发现,在10-2网格中受损的测试点群在稀疏的30-2网格中未被采样。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 20;9(6):e98525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098525. eCollection 2014.
7
Assessing visual field clustering schemes using machine learning classifiers in standard perimetry.在标准视野检查中使用机器学习分类器评估视野聚类方案。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Dec;48(12):5582-90. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0897.
8
Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials.
Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep;109(2):177-87. doi: 10.1007/s10633-004-5511-1.
9
Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP.多焦视觉诱发电位的正常范围及特异性
Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul;109(1):87-100. doi: 10.1007/s10633-004-3300-5.
10
Sectorization of central 10-deg visual field in open-angle glaucoma. An approach for its brief evaluation.开角型青光眼中央10度视野的分区。一种简要评估方法。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995 Oct;233(10):621-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00185282.