Suppr超能文献

经皮肾镜取石术治疗巨大鹿角形结石。

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large and staghorn calculi.

作者信息

Chibber P J

机构信息

University Department of Urology at the JJ Group of Hospital, Bombay, India.

出版信息

J Endourol. 1993 Aug;7(4):293-5. doi: 10.1089/end.1993.7.293.

Abstract

The treatment of choice for a stone load of up to 3 cm is indubitably extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). However, for larger stones, and particularly staghorn calculi, the choice is not that clearcut. Our experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for a stone load larger than 3 cm in 878 renal units over 9 years has left us convinced that a well-planned and determined effort at percutaneous clearance is the best option for these difficult cases. Our overall complete clearance rate in this group is 93% and ranges from 98.5% for solitary calculi to 71% for complete staghorn calculi. These results are comparable to those reported by other workers with percutaneous monotherapy and are superior to those achieved by SWL monotherapy. The complication rate was acceptably low at 4%. We conclude that the expeditiousness and the better stone-free rates of PCNL justify the slightly higher morbidity that it entails when compared with SWL monotherapy. We also prefer to aim for total clearance percutaneously, leaving for SWL only those stones that defy our best efforts.

摘要

对于结石负荷达3厘米的情况,毫无疑问,首选治疗方法是体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)。然而,对于更大的结石,尤其是鹿角形结石,选择就不那么明确了。我们在9年里对878个肾单位中结石负荷大于3厘米的患者进行经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的经验让我们确信,对于这些困难病例,精心规划并坚定地努力进行经皮清除是最佳选择。我们在该组中的总体完全清除率为93%,单个结石的清除率为98.5%,完全鹿角形结石的清除率为71%。这些结果与其他采用经皮单一疗法的研究者报告的结果相当,且优于SWL单一疗法所取得的结果。并发症发生率较低,为4%。我们得出结论,与SWL单一疗法相比,PCNL的快速性和更高的无石率证明了其伴随的稍高发病率是合理的。我们也倾向于通过经皮途径实现完全清除,仅将那些我们竭尽全力仍无法处理的结石留给SWL治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验