Jennum P, Dam M, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Neurol Scand. 1993 Oct;88(4):284-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1993.tb04237.x.
The present study was performed in order to compare: 1) the differences between oral and intravenous barbiturate on interictal epileptiform activity (sharp-waves and spikes) in the EEG, and 2) interictal epileptiform activity in the sphenoidal electrode compared to the temporal and zygomatic electrodes (an electrode placed at the cutaneous entry of the sphenoidal electrode) during intravenous barbiturate administration in patients with epilepsy. Two procedures were performed: 1) an oral pentobarbital sleep induction with 10-20 electrode placement including a zygomatic electrode, and 2) an intravenous thiopental sleep induction with the same electrode placement including a sphenoidal electrode. Thirty eight patients with complex partial seizures were included. During the oral pentobarbital procedure 34 of 38 (90%) patients showed interictal epileptiform activity compared with 22 of 38 (55%) patients during the intravenous thiopental procedure (p < 0.005). A interictal epileptiform focus was observed in 33 (87%) patients in the oral procedure and in 19 (50%) patients in the intravenous procedure (p < 0.01). Interictal epileptiform activity recorded in the sphenoidal electrode was also recorded in the zygomatic electrode. Except from two patients a good correlation was observed between the zygomatic electrodes and the F7/F8 electrodes. We conclude that administration of intravenous thiopental offers no advantage compared to the administration of oral pentobarbital as an activating procedure, and for standard interictal EEG recordings with sleep activation procedures, suitable places scalp electrodes including a zygomatic electrode with the use of oral pentobarbital may be sufficient.
1)口服和静脉注射巴比妥酸盐对脑电图发作间期癫痫样活动(尖波和棘波)的影响差异;2)在癫痫患者静脉注射巴比妥酸盐期间,蝶骨电极与颞部电极和颧部电极(放置在蝶骨电极皮肤入口处的电极)记录的发作间期癫痫样活动。进行了两项操作:1)口服戊巴比妥诱导睡眠,放置10 - 20个电极,包括一个颧部电极;2)静脉注射硫喷妥钠诱导睡眠,电极放置相同,包括一个蝶骨电极。纳入了38例复杂部分性发作患者。口服戊巴比妥操作过程中,38例患者中有34例(90%)出现发作间期癫痫样活动,而静脉注射硫喷妥钠操作过程中,38例患者中有22例(55%)出现发作间期癫痫样活动(p < 0.005)。口服操作中有33例(87%)患者观察到发作间期癫痫样病灶,静脉注射操作中有19例(50%)患者观察到发作间期癫痫样病灶(p < 0.01)。蝶骨电极记录到的发作间期癫痫样活动在颧部电极也有记录。除2例患者外,颧部电极与F7/F8电极之间观察到良好的相关性。我们得出结论,作为一种激活程序,静脉注射硫喷妥钠与口服戊巴比妥相比没有优势,对于采用睡眠激活程序的标准发作间期脑电图记录,使用口服戊巴比妥放置包括颧部电极在内的合适头皮电极可能就足够了。