Suppr超能文献

经胸和经食管超声心动图测量主动脉瓣环大小以确定人工瓣膜尺寸。

Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic sizing of the aortic annulus to determine prosthesis size.

作者信息

Harpaz D, Shah P, Bezante G, Heo M, Stewart S, Hicks G L, Hall W J, Meltzer R S

机构信息

University of Rochester Cardiology Unit, New York.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1993 Dec 15;72(18):1411-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90189-j.

Abstract

To assess the accuracy of 2-dimensional echocardiography versus transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in predicting aortic annulus diameter, and to determine which part of the cardiac cycle should be used for measuring the size of the aortic valve prosthesis in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, the aortic annulus was measured retrospectively in a blinded fashion in a group of 94 patients who had undergone aortic valve replacement: 66 had preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 69 had intraoperative TEE, and 41 had both. Accuracy of measurements was calculated by the mean biases (differences between annular size by echo and actual valve size chosen by intraoperative mechanical sizing of the aortic annulus). TTE was compared with TEE and end-diastolic (ED) measurements with end-systolic (ES) measurements. The mean biases +/- SD were -1.7 +/- 3.4 mm by TTE-ES versus -0.9 +/- 3.5 mm by TEE-ES measurements (p = NS), and +0.03 +/- 3 mm by TTE-ED versus +0.5 +/- 2.8 mm by TEE-ED (p = NS). Examination of the magnitudes of the biases gave the same result. ED measurements were found to have a smaller amount of bias than ES measurements, both by TTE and by TEE: -1.7 +/- 3.4 mm by TTE-ES versus +0.03 +/- 3 mm by TTE-ED (p = 0.0001) and -0.9 +/- 3.5 mm by TEE-ES versus +0.5 +/- 2.8 mm by TEE-ED (p = 0.0001). Examination of the magnitudes of the biases also gave the same result.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为评估二维超声心动图与经食管超声心动图(TEE)在预测主动脉瓣环直径方面的准确性,并确定在接受主动脉瓣置换术的患者中应使用心动周期的哪一部分来测量主动脉瓣人工瓣膜的大小,对一组94例接受主动脉瓣置换术的患者进行了回顾性、盲法测量主动脉瓣环:66例术前接受经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查,69例术中接受TEE检查,41例两者均接受。测量准确性通过平均偏差(超声测量的瓣环大小与术中主动脉瓣环机械测量所选择的实际瓣膜大小之间的差异)来计算。将TTE与TEE进行比较,并将舒张末期(ED)测量值与收缩末期(ES)测量值进行比较。TTE-ES测量的平均偏差±标准差为-1.7±3.4mm,而TEE-ES测量为-0.9±3.5mm(p=无显著性差异),TTE-ED为+0.03±3mm,TEE-ED为+0.5±2.8mm(p=无显著性差异)。对偏差大小的检查得出了相同的结果。发现无论是TTE还是TEE,ED测量的偏差量均小于ES测量:TTE-ES为-1.7±3.4mm,TTE-ED为+0.03±3mm(p=0.0001),TEE-ES为-0.9±3.5mm,TEE-ED为+0.5±2.8mm(p=0.0001)。对偏差大小的检查也得出了相同的结果。(摘要截短为250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验