Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣环测量:超声心动图与计算机断层扫描测量与直接手术测量的比较。

Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic versus computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heartcenter University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Oct;42(4):627-33. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs064. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The precise sizing of the aortic annulus is crucial in order to select the most appropriate valve size for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Owing to the closed heart situation in TAVI, sizing has to be performed based on preoperative imaging when compared with direct sizing during conventional procedures. The aim of the study was to evaluate valve sizing performed either by CT-scan or by echocardiography by comparing these imaging-based measurements with direct intraoperative sizing.

METHODS

Prior to the standard conventional aortic valve replacement, 26 patients underwent cardiac CT-scan and echocardiographic examination. Maximal annular diameter was measured by echocardiography at end-diastole and end-systole, including the leaflet calcifications. The CT-scan maximal, minimal and mean diameters were measured as well as the 'effective' diameter (CT(eff)). CT(eff) represents the diameter of a circle with the exact same area as the measured area of the annular circumference reconstructed from the CT-data set. Direct intraoperative diameters were measured after decalcification using metric sizers.

RESULTS

CT(eff) and end-systolic echocardiographic diameters showed best agreement with intraoperative direct sizing (intraop) in the Bland-Altman analysis [mean difference for transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) vs intraop 0.5 mm (limits of agreement -2.5-3.5); mean difference for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) vs intraop 0.38 mm (limits of agreement -3.28-4.03) and CT(eff) vs intraop -0.56 (limits of agreement -3.16-2.05)]. In patients with an oval-shaped annulus, CT(eff) demonstrated the best agreement with intraop [mean difference -0.32 (limits of agreement -2.29 to 1.66)].

CONCLUSIONS

Both the 'effective' CT diameter and end-systolic TEE values are the most reliable approaches for preoperative aortic annulus sizing. In patients with a pronounced oval-shaped annulus, the 'effective' CT diameter seems to be the method of choice. Therefore, aortic annulus measurement using 'effective' CT diameters should be included into current recommendations for TAVI sizing.

摘要

目的

精确测量主动脉瓣环大小对于经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)至关重要。由于 TAVI 是在心脏关闭的情况下进行的,因此与传统手术中的直接测量相比,必须基于术前影像学进行测量。本研究旨在通过比较基于影像学的测量值与直接术中测量值,评估通过 CT 扫描或超声心动图进行的瓣膜测量。

方法

在进行标准的常规主动脉瓣置换术之前,26 名患者接受了心脏 CT 扫描和超声心动图检查。舒张末期和收缩末期通过超声心动图测量瓣环最大直径,包括瓣叶钙化。还测量了 CT 扫描的最大、最小和平均直径以及“有效”直径(CT(eff))。CT(eff) 是指与从 CT 数据集重建的瓣环周长的测量面积具有相同面积的圆的直径。在去钙化后使用公制量规直接测量术中直径。

结果

在 Bland-Altman 分析中,CT(eff) 和收缩末期经食管超声心动图(TEE)直径与术中直接测量值(intraop)最吻合[经胸超声心动图(TTE)与 intraop 的平均差值为 0.5 毫米(一致性范围-2.5 至 3.5);TTE 与 intraop 的平均差值为 0.38 毫米(一致性范围-3.28 至 4.03)和 CT(eff) 与 intraop 的差值为-0.56 毫米(一致性范围-3.16 至 2.05)]。在瓣环呈椭圆形的患者中,CT(eff) 与 intraop 的吻合度最好[平均差值为-0.32 毫米(一致性范围为-2.29 至 1.66)]。

结论

“有效”CT 直径和收缩末期 TEE 值是术前主动脉瓣环测量最可靠的方法。在瓣环明显呈椭圆形的患者中,“有效”CT 直径似乎是首选方法。因此,应将使用“有效”CT 直径测量主动脉瓣环纳入 TAVI 测量的当前建议中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验