Vatle A
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Oct 10;113(24):3034-6.
For more than 2000 years, nothing has had so great an influence on western medicine as the Hippocratic writings of Aristotle and Galen. However, the legacy from these writings tends to be ambiguous, and two-fold. Some of them are clearly empirical, and make no attempt to philosophize about ultimate or proximate causes of disease. These are generally regarded as "genuinely Hippocratic". Other writings are dogmatic (rationalistic), and try to explain health and disease on the basis of pre-conceived ideas of the four humours of the human body. This distinction between empiricists and dogmaticians can be traced through Alexandria and Rome to modern times. The doctrine of the four humours does not seem to have had a beneficial effect on medical practice in Ancient Greece and Rome.
两千多年来,没有什么比亚里士多德和盖伦的希波克拉底著作对西方医学产生过如此重大的影响。然而,这些著作所遗留下来的东西往往模棱两可,具有双重性。其中一些显然是经验性的,并未试图对疾病的终极或直接原因进行哲学思考。这些通常被视为“真正的希波克拉底式”。其他著作则是教条式的(理性主义的),试图基于人体四种体液的先入之见来解释健康与疾病。这种经验主义者与教条主义者之间的区别可以从亚历山大里亚和罗马一直追溯到现代。四种体液学说在古希腊和罗马似乎并未对医学实践产生有益的影响。