Lissauer T, Richman S, Tempia M, Jenkins S, Taylor B
Paddington Green Children's Unit, St Mary's Hospital, London.
Arch Dis Child. 1993 Oct;69(4):423-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.4.423.
The aim of this study was to look at the influence of homelessness on acute medical admissions. A prospective case-controlled study was therefore performed on all homeless children admitted through the accident and emergency department over one year, comparing them with the next age matched admission from permanent housing. Assessments made were: whether homelessness or other social factors influenced the doctors' decision to admit; differences in severity of illness; length of stay; and use of primary care. The admitting doctors completed a semi-structured questionnaire during admission about social factors that influenced their decision to admit and graded the severity of the child's illness. The length of hospital stay was recorded. The family's social risk factors and accommodation were assessed at a home visit using a standardised questionnaire and by observation. Seventy homeless children were admitted. Social factors influenced the decision to admit in 77% of homeless children and 43% of controls. More of the homeless children were only mildly ill (33/70) than those from permanent housing (21/70), although three of the homeless children died of overwhelming infections compared with none of the controls. Among homeless families many were recent immigrants (44%). There was a marked increase in socioeconomic deprivation, in major life events in the previous year (median score 3 v 1), and in maternal depression (27% v 8%). Referral to the hospital was made by a general practitioner in only 5/50 (10%) of homeless compared with 18/50 (36%) of controls. Social factors were an important influence on the decision to admit in over three quarters of the homeless children and resulted in admission when less severely ill even when compared with admissions from an inner city population. Even though there was marked social deprivation among the homeless families, the decision to admit was based on vague criteria that need to be further refined.
本研究的目的是探讨无家可归对急性医疗入院情况的影响。因此,我们对一年内通过急诊部门收治的所有无家可归儿童进行了一项前瞻性病例对照研究,将他们与下一个年龄匹配的来自永久性住房家庭的入院儿童进行比较。评估内容包括:无家可归或其他社会因素是否影响医生的入院决定;疾病严重程度的差异;住院时间;以及初级保健的使用情况。收治医生在入院时填写了一份半结构化问卷,内容涉及影响他们入院决定的社会因素,并对儿童疾病的严重程度进行评分。记录住院时间。通过使用标准化问卷并进行观察,在家庭访视时评估家庭的社会风险因素和居住情况。共收治了70名无家可归儿童。社会因素影响了77%的无家可归儿童和43%的对照儿童的入院决定。与来自永久性住房家庭的儿童(21/70)相比,更多无家可归儿童只是轻症(33/70),不过有3名无家可归儿童死于严重感染,而对照儿童中无人死亡。在无家可归家庭中,许多是新移民(44%)。社会经济剥夺显著增加,前一年的重大生活事件(中位数评分3比1)以及母亲抑郁情况(27%比8%)也显著增加。无家可归儿童中只有5/50(10%)是由全科医生转诊至医院的,而对照儿童中这一比例为18/50(36%)。社会因素对超过四分之三的无家可归儿童的入院决定有重要影响,即使与来自市中心人口的入院情况相比,病情不太严重时也会导致入院。尽管无家可归家庭存在明显的社会剥夺,但入院决定基于模糊的标准,需要进一步完善。