• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过定量皮纹学反映的拉普人的群体关系。

Population relationships of Lapps as reflected by quantitative dermatoglyphics.

作者信息

Jantz R L, Eriksson A W, Brehme H

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-0720.

出版信息

Hum Biol. 1993 Oct;65(5):711-30.

PMID:8262502
Abstract

Relationships and divergence among five Lapp samples were assessed using finger and palm interdigital ridge counts. Lapp relationships to other Uralic speakers were also assessed. Multivariate minimum FST values expressing differentiation among Lapps are 0.012. These values are higher than those for most European populations and show the importance of isolation and genetic drift in Lapp populations. Skolt Lapps and Lapps of the Kola Peninsula are generally more similar to each other and are differentiated from Mountain and Fisher Lapps. When Lapps are placed within the context of Uralic speakers in general, they show a marked affinity for the Finnic speakers and are differentiated from the Samoyedic speakers of Siberia. The ridge counts support the hypothesis of a European origin for the Lapps.

摘要

利用手指和手掌指间嵴纹计数评估了五个拉普人样本之间的关系和差异。还评估了拉普人与其他乌拉尔语系使用者之间的关系。表示拉普人之间差异的多变量最小FST值为0.012。这些值高于大多数欧洲人群的值,表明隔离和基因漂变在拉普人群体中的重要性。斯科尔特拉普人和科拉半岛的拉普人通常彼此更相似,与山地拉普人和渔民拉普人有所不同。总体而言,当将拉普人置于乌拉尔语系使用者的背景中时,他们与芬兰语使用者表现出明显亲和力,与西伯利亚的萨摩耶语使用者有所不同。嵴纹计数支持拉普人起源于欧洲的假说。

相似文献

1
Population relationships of Lapps as reflected by quantitative dermatoglyphics.通过定量皮纹学反映的拉普人的群体关系。
Hum Biol. 1993 Oct;65(5):711-30.
2
Variation among European populations in summary finger ridge-count variables.欧洲人群在总结性指嵴计数变量方面的差异。
Ann Hum Biol. 1997 Mar-Apr;24(2):97-106. doi: 10.1080/03014469700004842.
3
Finger dermatoglyphics in the Corsican population (France).法国科西嘉岛人群的指纹纹理学
Anthropol Anz. 1999 Dec;57(4):339-47.
4
[Differentiation of the mitochondrial subhaplogroup U4 in the populations of Eastern Europe, Ural, and Western Siberia: implication to the genetic history of the Uralic populations].[东欧、乌拉尔及西西伯利亚人群中线粒体单倍群U4的分化:对乌拉尔语族人群遗传史的启示]
Genetika. 2004 Nov;40(11):1549-56.
5
Quantitative finger dermatoglyphics in a Spanish population (Tierra de Campos).
Anthropol Anz. 1986 Sep;44(3):227-38.
6
Finger dermatoglyphics in Delta de l'Ebre: a Mediterranean Spanish population.埃布罗三角洲的指纹纹理学:一个西班牙地中海人群。
Anthropol Anz. 1993 Sep;51(3):267-74.
7
Dermatoglyphics in Araucanian Indians from Patagonia and multivariate comparisons with other Argentinian aboriginal populations.
Hum Biol. 1997 Apr;69(2):227-39.
8
Digital dermatoglyphics of the Faroe Islanders.法罗群岛居民的数字皮纹学。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1983 Jul;61(3):337-45. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330610308.
9
Quantitative characterization of finger and palm dermatoglyphics in Bulgarians.
Anthropol Anz. 2008 Sep;66(3):295-315.
10
Dermatoglyphic analysis of La Liébana (Cantabria, Spain). 2. Finger ridge counts.
Anthropol Anz. 1993 Jun;51(2):147-58.