Itatani H, Yoshida O
Department of Urology, Sumitomo Hospital.
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1993 Nov;39(11):1067-70.
The treatment of staghorn calculi is still difficult even though urolithiasis treatment can now be performed by endourology and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) without open surgery. Because of the variety in volume and pattern of the staghorn calculi, especially with or without dilated renal pelvis and calyces, selection of treatment methods is important. The combined method of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and ESWL has been highly effective in the complete removal of most staghorn calculi. Developments of the ESWL instrument and tools have increased the success of less invasive ESWL monotherapy with placing of stent or percutaneous nephrostomy for staghorn calculi with nondilated calyces. Also the treatment methods should be selected depending upon the components of the staghorn calculi. Dissolution and solidity, which are affected by the components, are also important factors. Complete removal of staghorn calculi is very difficult, and almost impossible to be performed in only one occasion including other surgical procedures as a series and this is the existing insurance provision. Therefore, we await the creation of a new insurance provision for the treatment of staghorn calculi.
尽管目前通过腔内泌尿外科手术和体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)即可进行尿石症治疗,无需开放手术,但鹿角形结石的治疗仍然困难。由于鹿角形结石的体积和形态各异,尤其是伴有或不伴有肾盂和肾盏扩张,因此治疗方法的选择至关重要。经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)和ESWL联合治疗方法在完全清除大多数鹿角形结石方面非常有效。ESWL仪器和工具的发展提高了对肾盏未扩张的鹿角形结石进行微创ESWL单一疗法并置入支架或经皮肾造瘘术的成功率。此外,治疗方法应根据鹿角形结石的成分来选择。受成分影响的溶解性和坚固性也是重要因素。完全清除鹿角形结石非常困难,几乎不可能仅通过一次手术,包括一系列其他外科手术来完成,这就是现有的保险规定。因此,我们期待为鹿角形结石的治疗制定新的保险规定。