• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏导管实验室持续质量改进指南。心脏血管造影和介入学会实验室性能标准委员会。

Guidelines for continuous quality improvement in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Laboratory Performance Standards Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

作者信息

Heupler F A, al-Hani A J, Dear W E

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.

出版信息

Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993 Nov;30(3):191-200. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810300303.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.1810300303
PMID:8269488
Abstract

The Laboratory Performance Standards Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions has compiled guidelines for a quality improvement program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The first step is to identify "quality indicators" in order to quantify the results. The indicators must be risk-adjusted to assure validity of comparative data. The second step is development of a data collection process that continues after the patient has left the catheterization laboratory. The third step, data evaluation, requires determination of normal ranges of occurrence rates and identification of adverse events that exceed these rates. An investigation should be undertaken to determine the processes and systems that may produce the undesirable outcome. The fourth step is creation of a solution to correct the deficiency. This may involve education, administrative intervention, or feedback. The final step is reassessment of the quality indicators to determine if the corrective action has been effective.

摘要

心脏血管造影与介入学会的实验室性能标准委员会已经编纂了心脏导管插入实验室质量改进计划的指南。第一步是确定“质量指标”以便量化结果。这些指标必须经过风险调整以确保比较数据的有效性。第二步是建立一个在患者离开导管插入实验室后仍持续的数据收集流程。第三步,数据评估,需要确定发生率的正常范围并识别超过这些范围的不良事件。应该进行调查以确定可能产生不良结果的流程和系统。第四步是制定解决方案以纠正缺陷。这可能涉及教育、行政干预或反馈。最后一步是重新评估质量指标以确定纠正措施是否有效。

相似文献

1
Guidelines for continuous quality improvement in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Laboratory Performance Standards Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.心脏导管实验室持续质量改进指南。心脏血管造影和介入学会实验室性能标准委员会。
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993 Nov;30(3):191-200. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810300303.
2
Guidelines for internal peer review in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Laboratory Performance Standards Committee, Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997 Jan;40(1):21-32. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199701)40:1<21::aid-ccd6>3.0.co;2-d.
3
Assessing quality in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Am Heart Hosp J. 2003 Fall;1(4):289-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-9215.2003.02360.x.
4
Mobile cardiac catheterization laboratories. Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Laboratory Performance Standards Committee.移动心脏导管实验室。心脏血管造影和介入学会实验室性能标准委员会。
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992 May;26(1):71-2. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810260116.
5
Cardiac catheterization laboratory survey: 1990. Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions, Laboratory Performance Standards Committee.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992 Dec;27(4):267-75. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810270405.
6
[Quality assurance with administrative data (QSR): follow-up in quality measurement - an analysis of patient records].[行政数据质量保证(QSR):质量测量中的随访——患者记录分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(9-10):673-81. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
7
Quality assessment and improvement in interventional cardiology: a Position Statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Part II: public reporting and risk adjustment.介入心脏病学中的质量评估与改进:心血管造影和介入学会立场声明,第二部分:公开报告与风险调整
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct 1;78(4):493-502. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23153. Epub 2011 May 5.
8
A national clinical quality program for Veterans Affairs catheterization laboratories (from the Veterans Affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking program).一项针对退伍军人事务部导管实验室的全国临床质量计划(源自退伍军人事务部临床评估、报告和跟踪计划)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 1;114(11):1750-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.08.045. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.美国心脏病学会/心血管造影和介入学会关于心导管实验室标准的临床专家共识文件。美国心脏病学会临床专家共识文件特别工作组报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jun 15;37(8):2170-214. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01346-8.
10
[Optimizing systems of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction. STEMI networks, telemetry ECG, and standardized quality improvement with systematic data feedback].[优化急性心肌梗死患者的护理系统。ST段抬高型心肌梗死网络、遥测心电图以及通过系统数据反馈进行标准化质量改进]
Herz. 2008 Mar;33(2):102-9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-008-3120-6.