Leibel S A, Fuks Z, Zelefsky M J, Whitmore W F
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY 10021.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Jan 1;28(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90135-x.
The effect of local and regional treatment on the development of distant metastases in patients with localized node negative and node positive carcinoma of the prostate is examined.
Distant metastases-free survival was evaluated in 1078 patients with Stage B-C node negative (733 patients) or node positive (345 patients) carcinoma of the prostate, staged with pelvic lymph node dissection and treated with retropublic 125I implantation at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1970 and 1985.
The 15-year actuarial distant metastases-free survival rate for the entire group of patients was 27%. Lymph node involvement was the most significant covariate affecting distant metastases-free survival, although local failure, stage, and grade were also independent variables. Distant metastases-free survival varied with the extent of lymph node involvement (N0 vs. N1, p < 0.0001; N1 vs. N2, p < 0.0001). However, the difference between N1 and N2 patients was due to a faster rate of development of distant metastases in N2 patients. The ultimate 10-year distant metastases-free survival rate was similar for the two patient groups (11% for N1 and 9% for N2). Local failure correlated with the metastatic outcome in patients with B-C/N0 disease (p < 0.00001), but not in N1 or N2 patients. Although distant metastases-free survival in locally controlled N1 patients was improved compared to N2 patients (p = 0.004), when stratified by primary tumor stage and grade, the differences were no longer significant.
Essentially all node positive patients with carcinoma of the prostate will develop distant metastatic disease if followed for sufficiently long periods of time. This is consistent with the hypothesis that in such patients distant micrometastatic dissemination already exists at the time of initial diagnosis. The data suggest that clinical trials designed to test whether improvements in local therapy impact on survival should be restricted to node negative patients. The data also raise concerns regarding the therapeutic value of elective whole pelvic irradiation.
研究局部和区域治疗对局限性前列腺癌伴或不伴淋巴结转移患者远处转移发生情况的影响。
对1078例B - C期前列腺癌患者进行评估,其中733例淋巴结阴性,345例淋巴结阳性,通过盆腔淋巴结清扫进行分期,并于1970年至1985年在纪念斯隆 - 凯特琳癌症中心接受耻骨后¹²⁵I植入治疗。
整组患者15年精算无远处转移生存率为27%。淋巴结受累是影响无远处转移生存的最显著协变量,尽管局部失败、分期和分级也是独立变量。无远处转移生存随淋巴结受累程度而异(N0与N1,p < 0.0001;N1与N2,p < 0.0001)。然而,N1和N2患者之间的差异是由于N2患者远处转移发展速度更快。两组患者最终10年无远处转移生存率相似(N1为11%,N2为9%)。局部失败与B - C/N0疾病患者的转移结局相关(p < 0.00001),但与N1或N2患者无关。尽管局部控制的N1患者与N2患者相比无远处转移生存有所改善(p = 0.004),但按原发肿瘤分期和分级分层后,差异不再显著。
如果随访时间足够长,基本上所有前列腺癌淋巴结阳性患者都会发生远处转移性疾病。这与以下假设一致,即在这些患者中,初始诊断时已存在远处微转移扩散。数据表明,旨在测试局部治疗改善是否影响生存的临床试验应仅限于淋巴结阴性患者。数据还引发了对选择性全盆腔照射治疗价值的担忧。