Talcott J A, Whalen A, Clark J, Rieker P P, Finberg R
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115.
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jan;12(1):107-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.1.107.
To assess the feasibility of early discharge to home therapy with standard intravenous antibiotics in 30 patients with fever and neutropenia at low risk by a validated clinical decision rule.
Newly admitted outpatients with fever and neutropenia were evaluated for home therapy during 2 days of inpatient observation. To evaluate enrolled patients' acceptance of home care, we assessed patient attitudes and quality of life before and after home therapy. To assess economic effects, we compared the medical charges of patients treated at home with those of medically eligible patients who remained in the hospital.
Of the first 84 patients, 50 (60%) were medically ineligible, and neutropenia was resolved in another eight (10%) during the observation period. Only nine patients of the remaining 26 who were medically eligible (35%) were enrolled in the home-therapy trial. Thereafter, 21 of 31 medically eligible patients (68%) were enrolled. The 30 patients treated at home were neutropenic for a median of 6 days (mean, 8.2). Four had medical complications, and five others were readmitted for observation. Patients' quality of life improved during home therapy, and favorable attitudes toward home care persisted after treatment. Medically eligible patients not enrolled had briefer neutropenia than patients treated at home, but had 44% higher daily medical charges and equivalent overall charges despite treatment half as long.
We conclude that early discharge of low-risk patients to home intravenous antibiotic therapy is feasible, is well received by patients, and may prove to be cost-saving. However, these conclusions must be validated in a large randomized trial.
通过一项经验证的临床决策规则,评估30例低风险发热伴中性粒细胞减少患者早期出院接受标准静脉抗生素家庭治疗的可行性。
对新入院的发热伴中性粒细胞减少门诊患者在住院观察2天期间进行家庭治疗评估。为评估入组患者对家庭护理的接受程度,我们在家庭治疗前后评估了患者的态度和生活质量。为评估经济影响,我们比较了在家治疗患者与符合医疗条件但仍住院患者的医疗费用。
在前84例患者中,50例(60%)不符合医疗条件,另有8例(10%)在观察期内中性粒细胞减少症得到缓解。在其余26例符合医疗条件的患者中,只有9例(35%)入组家庭治疗试验。此后,31例符合医疗条件的患者中有21例(68%)入组。在家治疗的30例患者中性粒细胞减少的中位时间为6天(平均8.2天)。4例出现医疗并发症,另有5例再次入院观察。患者在家庭治疗期间生活质量有所改善,治疗后对家庭护理仍持积极态度。未入组的符合医疗条件患者中性粒细胞减少时间比在家治疗的患者短,但每日医疗费用高44%,尽管治疗时间只有在家治疗患者的一半,但总费用相当。
我们得出结论,低风险患者早期出院接受家庭静脉抗生素治疗是可行的,患者接受度高,且可能节省成本。然而,这些结论必须在大型随机试验中得到验证。