• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低风险癌症发热伴中性粒细胞减少患者的家庭抗生素治疗:基于有效预测规则的30例患者的初步研究

Home antibiotic therapy for low-risk cancer patients with fever and neutropenia: a pilot study of 30 patients based on a validated prediction rule.

作者信息

Talcott J A, Whalen A, Clark J, Rieker P P, Finberg R

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jan;12(1):107-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.1.107.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1994.12.1.107
PMID:8270967
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of early discharge to home therapy with standard intravenous antibiotics in 30 patients with fever and neutropenia at low risk by a validated clinical decision rule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Newly admitted outpatients with fever and neutropenia were evaluated for home therapy during 2 days of inpatient observation. To evaluate enrolled patients' acceptance of home care, we assessed patient attitudes and quality of life before and after home therapy. To assess economic effects, we compared the medical charges of patients treated at home with those of medically eligible patients who remained in the hospital.

RESULTS

Of the first 84 patients, 50 (60%) were medically ineligible, and neutropenia was resolved in another eight (10%) during the observation period. Only nine patients of the remaining 26 who were medically eligible (35%) were enrolled in the home-therapy trial. Thereafter, 21 of 31 medically eligible patients (68%) were enrolled. The 30 patients treated at home were neutropenic for a median of 6 days (mean, 8.2). Four had medical complications, and five others were readmitted for observation. Patients' quality of life improved during home therapy, and favorable attitudes toward home care persisted after treatment. Medically eligible patients not enrolled had briefer neutropenia than patients treated at home, but had 44% higher daily medical charges and equivalent overall charges despite treatment half as long.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that early discharge of low-risk patients to home intravenous antibiotic therapy is feasible, is well received by patients, and may prove to be cost-saving. However, these conclusions must be validated in a large randomized trial.

摘要

目的

通过一项经验证的临床决策规则,评估30例低风险发热伴中性粒细胞减少患者早期出院接受标准静脉抗生素家庭治疗的可行性。

患者与方法

对新入院的发热伴中性粒细胞减少门诊患者在住院观察2天期间进行家庭治疗评估。为评估入组患者对家庭护理的接受程度,我们在家庭治疗前后评估了患者的态度和生活质量。为评估经济影响,我们比较了在家治疗患者与符合医疗条件但仍住院患者的医疗费用。

结果

在前84例患者中,50例(60%)不符合医疗条件,另有8例(10%)在观察期内中性粒细胞减少症得到缓解。在其余26例符合医疗条件的患者中,只有9例(35%)入组家庭治疗试验。此后,31例符合医疗条件的患者中有21例(68%)入组。在家治疗的30例患者中性粒细胞减少的中位时间为6天(平均8.2天)。4例出现医疗并发症,另有5例再次入院观察。患者在家庭治疗期间生活质量有所改善,治疗后对家庭护理仍持积极态度。未入组的符合医疗条件患者中性粒细胞减少时间比在家治疗的患者短,但每日医疗费用高44%,尽管治疗时间只有在家治疗患者的一半,但总费用相当。

结论

我们得出结论,低风险患者早期出院接受家庭静脉抗生素治疗是可行的,患者接受度高,且可能节省成本。然而,这些结论必须在大型随机试验中得到验证。

相似文献

1
Home antibiotic therapy for low-risk cancer patients with fever and neutropenia: a pilot study of 30 patients based on a validated prediction rule.低风险癌症发热伴中性粒细胞减少患者的家庭抗生素治疗:基于有效预测规则的30例患者的初步研究
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jan;12(1):107-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.1.107.
2
Once daily, oral, outpatient quinolone monotherapy for low-risk cancer patients with fever and neutropenia: a pilot study of 40 patients based on validated risk-prediction rules.低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症癌症患者每日一次口服喹诺酮单药门诊治疗:基于经验证的风险预测规则对40例患者的初步研究
Cancer. 2006 Jun 1;106(11):2489-94. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21908.
3
Safety of early discharge for low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.低危发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者提前出院的安全性:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 20;29(30):3977-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.0884. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
4
Oral antibiotics with early hospital discharge compared with in-patient intravenous antibiotics for low-risk febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer: a prospective randomised controlled single centre study.口服抗生素联合早期出院与住院静脉使用抗生素治疗癌症患者低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照单中心研究。
Br J Cancer. 2003 Jul 7;89(1):43-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600993.
5
Costs of home versus inpatient treatment for fever and neutropenia: analysis of a multicenter randomized trial.家庭治疗与住院治疗发热伴中性粒细胞减少症的成本比较:一项多中心随机试验分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 20;29(30):3984-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.1247. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
6
Management of febrile neutropenia in solid tumours and lymphomas using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index: feasibility and safety in routine clinical practice.使用癌症支持治疗多国协会(MASCC)风险指数管理实体瘤和淋巴瘤中的发热性中性粒细胞减少症:常规临床实践中的可行性和安全性
Support Care Cancer. 2008 May;16(5):485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0334-8. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
7
Outpatient therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.口服氧氟沙星用于低风险中性粒细胞减少症和发热患者的门诊治疗:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Cancer. 1999 Jan 1;85(1):213-9.
8
Feasibility of withholding antibiotics in selected febrile neutropenic cancer patients.对部分发热性中性粒细胞减少症癌症患者停用抗生素的可行性。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20;23(30):7437-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.5264.
9
A double-blind comparison of empirical oral and intravenous antibiotic therapy for low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy.癌症化疗期间低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性口服与静脉抗生素治疗的双盲比较
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 29;341(5):305-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907293410501.
10
Safety and cost effectiveness of early hospital discharge of lower risk children with cancer admitted for fever and neutropenia.低风险癌症患儿因发热和中性粒细胞减少症入院后早期出院的安全性和成本效益
Cancer. 1994 Jul 1;74(1):189-96. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940701)74:1<189::aid-cncr2820740130>3.0.co;2-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying cost savings from outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy programme: a systematic review and meta-analysis.量化门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗方案节省的费用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Apr 8;7(2):dlaf049. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf049. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Home Cancer Care Research: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis (1990-2021).家庭癌症护理研究:文献计量学和可视化分析(1990-2021)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 12;19(20):13116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013116.
3
Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with febrile neutropenia using machine learning models.
使用机器学习模型预测发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的住院死亡率。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104140. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
4
Prospective Evaluation of Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Risk Index Score for Gynecologic Oncology Patients With Febrile Neutropenia.多国癌症支持治疗协会妇科肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少症风险指数评分的前瞻性评估。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb;42(2):138-142. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000498.
5
A cohort study on protocol-based nurse-led out-patient management of post-chemotherapy low-risk febrile neutropenia.基于方案的护士主导的化疗后低危发热性中性粒细胞减少症门诊管理的队列研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3039-3045. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4157-6. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
Clinical and cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of ommunity ntraenous ntibiotic ervice models: CIVAS systematic review.社区静脉抗生素服务模式的临床及成本效益、安全性与可接受性:CIVAS系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 20;7(4):e013560. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013560.
7
Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients.癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的口服与静脉抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 9;2013(10):CD003992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003992.pub3.
8
Febrile neutropenia in hematologic malignancies.血液恶性肿瘤患者的中性粒细胞减少伴发热。
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2013 Dec;8(4):370-8. doi: 10.1007/s11899-013-0171-4.
9
The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index score: 10 years of use for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients.多国癌症支持治疗协会(MASCC)风险指数评分:用于识别低危发热性中性粒细胞减少症癌症患者的 10 年应用。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 May;21(5):1487-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1758-y. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
10
Costs of home versus inpatient treatment for fever and neutropenia: analysis of a multicenter randomized trial.家庭治疗与住院治疗发热伴中性粒细胞减少症的成本比较:一项多中心随机试验分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 20;29(30):3984-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.1247. Epub 2011 Sep 19.