Hidalgo M, Hornedo J, Lumbreras C, Trigo J M, Colomer R, Perea S, Gómez C, Ruiz A, García-Carbonero R, Cortés-Funes H
Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Cancer. 1999 Jan 1;85(1):213-9.
Hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics is the standard care for patients with neutropenia and fever. This randomized clinical trial evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of ambulatory care with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and fever.
Patients with solid tumors who were treated with conventional dose chemotherapy, presented with fever (axillary temperature >38 degrees C on 2 occasions or >38.5 degrees C on a single occasion) and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, <500 cells/microL), and met low risk criteria were eligible for this study. They were randomized either to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, which consisted of a combination of cefazidime and amikacin, or to outpatient treatment with oral ofloxacin. The definitions of fever of unknown origin, clinical and microbiologic infection, success, success with modification, and failure were the usual ones for this type of study.
One hundred episodes were randomized, and 95 were evaluable (47 were randomized to ceftazidime/amikacin and 48 to ofloxacin). Baseline characteristics, as well as the proportion of patients with microbiologic and clinical infections, were similar in the two groups. In 91% of episodes in the inpatient group and 89% in the ofloxacin group, patients recovered uneventfully (P=1; 95% CI for the difference, -0.09 to 0.13), with 2 and 5 patients requiring modification of the antibiotics, respectively. Eight percent of episodes in the control group and 10.4% in the experimental group resulted in treatment failure. Eight patients (16%) in the outpatient group experienced failure with ambulatory care and were admitted to the hospital.
Outpatient oral antibiotic therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever is safe and similar in efficacy to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotics.
对于中性粒细胞减少症和发热患者,住院并用广谱静脉抗生素治疗是标准治疗方法。这项随机临床试验评估了口服氧氟沙星门诊治疗低风险、化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症和发热患者的可行性和疗效。
接受常规剂量化疗的实体瘤患者,出现发热(腋温2次>38℃或单次>38.5℃)和中性粒细胞减少症(绝对中性粒细胞计数<500个/微升)且符合低风险标准者可纳入本研究。他们被随机分为两组,一组住院并用由头孢他啶和阿米卡星组成的广谱静脉抗生素治疗,另一组接受口服氧氟沙星门诊治疗。不明原因发热、临床和微生物感染、成功、调整后成功及失败的定义与这类研究常用的定义相同。
100例患者被随机分组,95例可评估(47例被随机分入头孢他啶/阿米卡星组,48例分入氧氟沙星组)。两组的基线特征以及微生物和临床感染患者的比例相似。住院组91%的病例和氧氟沙星组89%的病例患者顺利康复(P = 1;差异的95%CI为-0.09至0.13),分别有2例和5例患者需要调整抗生素。对照组8%的病例和试验组10.4%的病例治疗失败。门诊组8例患者(16%)门诊治疗失败并入院。
对于低风险中性粒细胞减少症和发热患者,口服氧氟沙星门诊抗生素治疗安全,疗效与住院并用广谱肠外抗生素治疗相似。