Maksymiuk A W, Jett J R, Earle J D, Su J Q, Diegert F A, Mailliard J A, Kardinal C G, Krook J E, Veeder M H, Wiesenfeld M
Saskatchewan Cancer Foundation-Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jan;12(1):70-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.1.70.
The combination of etoposide (E) and cisplatin (P) is an accepted standard therapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, the optimal sequencing and administration schedule has not been defined. This study was designed to evaluate different sequencing and administration schedules of E and P in the treatment of SCLC.
Five hundred fifty-two eligible patients with limited-(LD) and extensive-stage (ED) SCLC were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: arm A, P 30 mg/m2 by intravenous (IV) bolus followed by E 130 mg/m2 bolus; arm B, E 130 mg/m2 bolus followed by P 30 mg/m2 bolus; arm C, E 130 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion and P 30 mg/m2 bolus at the end of each 24-hour infusion of E; arm D, E 130 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion and P 45 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on day 2 and 3 only. Two 3-day induction cycles of IV EP were administered 4 weeks apart. Subsequent therapy was the same for all arms, consisting of four cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) at 4-week intervals. Consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were administered to responders.
The overall response rate (84%) was similar in all treatment arms. Treatment arm A was associated with the best complete response (CR) rate (52%), the most favorable median survival time (MST) of 15 months, and a 26% 2-year survival rate. Patients with LD on arm A had a MST of 20 months and a 42% 2-year survival rate. Multivariate analysis indicated that extent of disease, performance status, arm of therapy, and sex were significant independent factors influencing survival. Toxicity of the four regimens was similar, except for greater thrombocytopenia on arm D.
The bolus administration of EP with E following P for the first two cycles of chemotherapy was the most effective regimen, with especially encouraging survival for LD patients.
依托泊苷(E)和顺铂(P)联合方案是小细胞肺癌(SCLC)公认的标准治疗方法;然而,最佳的给药顺序和方案尚未确定。本研究旨在评估E和P不同的给药顺序和方案在SCLC治疗中的效果。
552例符合条件的局限期(LD)和广泛期(ED)SCLC患者被随机分为以下治疗方案之一:A组,静脉推注P 30 mg/m²,随后静脉推注E 130 mg/m²;B组,静脉推注E 130 mg/m²,随后静脉推注P 30 mg/m²;C组,E 130 mg/m²持续24小时输注,在每次E 24小时输注结束时静脉推注P 30 mg/m²;D组,E 130 mg/m²持续24小时输注,仅在第2天和第3天P 45 mg/m²持续24小时输注。每4周进行两个为期3天的静脉EP诱导周期。所有组后续治疗相同,包括每4周进行四个周期的环磷酰胺、阿霉素和长春新碱(CAV)。对缓解者进行巩固性胸部放射治疗(TRT)和预防性颅脑照射(PCI)。
所有治疗组的总缓解率(84%)相似。A组的完全缓解(CR)率最高(52%),中位生存时间(MST)最理想,为15个月,2年生存率为26%。A组LD患者的MST为20个月,2年生存率为42%。多因素分析表明,疾病范围、体能状态、治疗组和性别是影响生存的重要独立因素。四种方案的毒性相似,除D组血小板减少更严重。
在前两个化疗周期中,P后推注E的EP给药方案是最有效的方案,对LD患者的生存尤其令人鼓舞。