Pujol J L, Carestia L, Daurès J P
Départment de Biostatistiques Epidemiologie et Recherche Clinique, Institut Universitaire de Recherche Clinique, Montpellier, France.
Br J Cancer. 2000 Jul;83(1):8-15. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1164.
Chemotherapy is the backbone of small-cell lung cancer therapy. However, optimal drug combinations and schedules remain to be defined and there is hitherto no world-wide accepted standard regimen. Cisplatin, an alkylating agent with high putative toxicity is currently widely used although its effectiveness in this disease has not been established firmly. We conducted a meta-analysis of published data reporting trials randomizing a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent in order to determine possible differences in survival response and toxicity. Nineteen trials have been identified in medical literature (4054 evaluable patients). Ten trials randomized patients to receive a cisplatin-etoposide regimen versus a regimen without any of these two drugs. A subgroup analysis was, therefore, carried out in the nine remaining trials that randomly allocated patients between two regimens differing in the absence or presence of cisplatin, whereas etoposide was given (or not given) in both arms (1579 evaluable patients). The DerSimonian and Laird method was used to estimate the size effects and the Peto and Yusuf method was used in order to generate the odds ratios (OR) of reduction in risk of death and the increase in probability of being responders to chemotherapy. There was no significant difference between the cisplatin-containing regimen and the regimen without this drug when the risk of toxic-death was taken into account with respective probabilities of 3.1 and 2.7% (NS). Patients randomized in a cisplatin-containing regimen had an increase in probability of being responders with an OR of 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.18-1.55; P < 10(-5) corresponding to an increase of objective (partial plus complete) response rate from 0.62 to 0.69 (a result taking into account a significant heterogeneity). Patients treated with a cisplatin-containing regimen benefited from a significant reduction of risk of death at 6 months and 1 year with respective OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-0.98, P = 0.03, and or 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93, P = 0.002 (no statistical heterogeneity). This corresponded to a significant increase in the probability of survival of 2.6% and 4.4% at 6 months and 1 year respectively. The meta-analysis restricted to the subset of nine trials without etoposide treatment imbalance reached similar conclusions. A cisplatin-containing regimen yields a higher response rate and probability of survival than does a chemotherapy containing others alkylating agents without a perceptible increase in risk of toxic-death.
化疗是小细胞肺癌治疗的核心。然而,最佳的药物组合和治疗方案仍有待确定,目前尚无全球公认的标准方案。顺铂是一种具有较高潜在毒性的烷化剂,尽管其在该疾病中的有效性尚未得到确凿证实,但目前仍被广泛使用。我们对已发表的数据进行了一项荟萃分析,这些数据报告了将含顺铂方案与不含这种烷化剂的方案进行随机分组的试验,以确定生存反应和毒性方面可能存在的差异。在医学文献中已确定了19项试验(4054例可评估患者)。10项试验将患者随机分为接受顺铂-依托泊苷方案组和不使用这两种药物中任何一种的方案组。因此,在其余9项试验中进行了亚组分析,这些试验将患者随机分配到两种方案中,两种方案的区别在于是否含有顺铂,而两组均给予(或不给予)依托泊苷(1579例可评估患者)。采用DerSimonian和Laird方法估计效应量,采用Peto和Yusuf方法生成死亡风险降低的比值比(OR)以及化疗反应者概率增加的比值比。当考虑到毒性死亡风险时,含顺铂方案与不含该药物的方案之间无显著差异,各自的概率分别为3.1%和2.7%(无显著性差异)。随机接受含顺铂方案的患者反应者概率增加,OR为1.35,95%置信区间(CI)为1.18 - 1.55;P < 10⁻⁵,对应客观(部分加完全)缓解率从0.62提高到0.69(该结果考虑了显著的异质性)。接受含顺铂方案治疗的患者在6个月和1年时死亡风险显著降低,OR分别为0.87,95% CI为0.75 - 0.98,P = 0.03,以及OR为0.80,95% CI为0.69 - 0.93,P = 0.002(无统计学异质性)。这分别对应6个月和1年时生存率显著提高2.6%和4.4%。仅限于无依托泊苷治疗失衡的9项试验子集的荟萃分析得出了类似的结论。与不含顺铂的化疗方案相比,含顺铂方案产生更高的缓解率和生存率,且毒性死亡风险没有明显增加。