Weisberg E, Fraser I S, Goss S
Sydney Centre for Reproductive Health Research, Family Planning Association of New South Wales.
Med J Aust. 1994 Jan 3;160(1):19-21.
To assess the attitudes and practices of general practitioners (GPs) in New South Wales in regard to intrauterine device (IUD) use.
Randomised group comparison of 100 rural and 100 urban GPs by questionnaire.
Sixty-five rural and 66 urban general practitioners took part in the study.
Almost 50% of GPs who responded to the questionnaire always discussed the IUD when counselling about contraception, whereas 6% never discussed IUDs. Rural GPs were more likely to discuss IUD use than urban GPs. In the past, 68.7% of GPs had inserted IUDs but only 20.6% still inserted them. Fifty per cent of GPs who did not currently insert IUDs felt they lacked expertise due to less demand for IUDs from women or inadequate training.
Prevailing community attitudes towards intrauterine devices have resulted in fewer requests to general practitioners for IUDs, resulting in a lack of expertise in IUD insertion. Increased litigation associated with IUD use, and subsequent publicity, has increased the cost of medical indemnity insurance. All these factors have contributed to fewer GPs being prepared to insert IUDs. Australian women are being deprived of balanced information about the benefits and risks of IUD use and of the possibility of using this very effective, low-cost, low-maintenance method of contraception.
评估新南威尔士州全科医生(GPs)在宫内节育器(IUD)使用方面的态度和做法。
通过问卷调查对100名农村全科医生和100名城市全科医生进行随机分组比较。
65名农村全科医生和66名城市全科医生参与了该研究。
在回复问卷的全科医生中,近50%在提供避孕咨询时总是会讨论宫内节育器,而6%从未讨论过。农村全科医生比城市全科医生更有可能讨论宫内节育器的使用。过去,68.7%的全科医生曾放置过宫内节育器,但目前仍在放置的仅占20.6%。50%目前不放置宫内节育器的全科医生认为,由于女性对宫内节育器的需求减少或培训不足,他们缺乏相关专业知识。
社区对宫内节育器的普遍态度导致向全科医生咨询宫内节育器的人数减少,进而导致放置宫内节育器的专业知识不足。与宫内节育器使用相关的诉讼增加以及随之而来的宣传,增加了医疗责任保险的成本。所有这些因素导致愿意放置宫内节育器的全科医生减少。澳大利亚女性被剥夺了关于宫内节育器使用的益处和风险的平衡信息,以及使用这种非常有效、低成本、低维护的避孕方法的可能性。