Stubbs Esther, Schamp Adrianna
Can Fam Physician. 2008 Apr;54(4):560-6.
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) for contraception are used infrequently in Canada despite their well-studied safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to investigate FPs' perceptions of the risks of and indications for using IUDs, as these perceptions might be a key factor in why IUDs are underused.
Mailed survey.
Kingston, a midsized city in Ontario.
All FPs practising in Kingston.
The primary outcome was the proportion of FPs who ranked the importance of risks of and contraindications to using IUDs in keeping with rankings in established clinical guidelines.Secondary outcomes were FP IUD prescription and insertion patterns, their perceptions of patients' access to physicians who insert IUDs, and their interest in a course on IUD insertion.
Response rate was 81%. Contrary to the evidence, more than 60% of FPs thought pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy were major risks, and nearly half thought failure of IUDs was a major risk. Fewer than one-third would recommend IUDs as an option for nulliparous women, for postcoital contraception, for women with moderate-sized fibroids, or for women with pelvic inflammatory disease during the last year,though none of these are contraindications according to established clinical guidelines. About 82% of FPs prescribed IUDs, and 41% inserted them. Newer graduates were more likely than older graduates to prescribe only levonorgestrel IUDs (36% vs 8%). About 93% of survey respondents reported that patients' access to physicians who insert IUDs was not a factor in recommending IUDs to them.
A substantial proportion of surveyed FPs believed that the side effects of IUDs were more severe than is supported by clinical guidelines and were misinformed about the range of women who could benefit from IUDs. These misconceptions likely contribute to the low rate of IUD use in Canada.
尽管宫内节育器(IUD)的安全性和有效性已得到充分研究,但在加拿大,用于避孕的宫内节育器使用并不频繁。本研究的目的是调查家庭医生(FPs)对使用宫内节育器的风险和适应症的看法,因为这些看法可能是宫内节育器使用不足的关键因素。
邮寄调查。
安大略省的中型城市金斯顿。
在金斯顿执业的所有家庭医生。
主要结果是家庭医生根据既定临床指南对使用宫内节育器的风险和禁忌症重要性的排名比例。次要结果是家庭医生的宫内节育器处方和插入模式、他们对患者能否接触到插入宫内节育器的医生的看法,以及他们对宫内节育器插入课程的兴趣。
回复率为81%。与证据相反,超过60%的家庭医生认为盆腔炎和异位妊娠是主要风险,近一半的家庭医生认为宫内节育器失效是主要风险。在过去一年中,不到三分之一的家庭医生会推荐宫内节育器作为未生育女性、性交后避孕、患有中等大小肌瘤的女性或患有盆腔炎的女性的选择,尽管根据既定临床指南,这些都不是禁忌症。约82%的家庭医生开具宫内节育器处方,41%的家庭医生进行宫内节育器插入操作。新毕业的医生比年长的医生更有可能只开具左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器(36%对8%)。约93%的调查受访者表示,患者能否接触到插入宫内节育器的医生不是向他们推荐宫内节育器的因素。
相当一部分接受调查的家庭医生认为宫内节育器的副作用比临床指南所支持的更严重,并且对能够从宫内节育器中受益的女性范围了解有误。这些误解可能导致加拿大宫内节育器使用率较低。