Suppr超能文献

证据确凿。为什么宫内节育器仍然不普及?家庭医生对风险和适应症的看法。

The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out?: family physicians' perceptions of risk and indications.

作者信息

Stubbs Esther, Schamp Adrianna

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2008 Apr;54(4):560-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) for contraception are used infrequently in Canada despite their well-studied safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to investigate FPs' perceptions of the risks of and indications for using IUDs, as these perceptions might be a key factor in why IUDs are underused.

DESIGN

Mailed survey.

SETTING

Kingston, a midsized city in Ontario.

PARTICIPANTS

All FPs practising in Kingston.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of FPs who ranked the importance of risks of and contraindications to using IUDs in keeping with rankings in established clinical guidelines.Secondary outcomes were FP IUD prescription and insertion patterns, their perceptions of patients' access to physicians who insert IUDs, and their interest in a course on IUD insertion.

RESULTS

Response rate was 81%. Contrary to the evidence, more than 60% of FPs thought pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy were major risks, and nearly half thought failure of IUDs was a major risk. Fewer than one-third would recommend IUDs as an option for nulliparous women, for postcoital contraception, for women with moderate-sized fibroids, or for women with pelvic inflammatory disease during the last year,though none of these are contraindications according to established clinical guidelines. About 82% of FPs prescribed IUDs, and 41% inserted them. Newer graduates were more likely than older graduates to prescribe only levonorgestrel IUDs (36% vs 8%). About 93% of survey respondents reported that patients' access to physicians who insert IUDs was not a factor in recommending IUDs to them.

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of surveyed FPs believed that the side effects of IUDs were more severe than is supported by clinical guidelines and were misinformed about the range of women who could benefit from IUDs. These misconceptions likely contribute to the low rate of IUD use in Canada.

摘要

目的

尽管宫内节育器(IUD)的安全性和有效性已得到充分研究,但在加拿大,用于避孕的宫内节育器使用并不频繁。本研究的目的是调查家庭医生(FPs)对使用宫内节育器的风险和适应症的看法,因为这些看法可能是宫内节育器使用不足的关键因素。

设计

邮寄调查。

地点

安大略省的中型城市金斯顿。

参与者

在金斯顿执业的所有家庭医生。

主要观察指标

主要结果是家庭医生根据既定临床指南对使用宫内节育器的风险和禁忌症重要性的排名比例。次要结果是家庭医生的宫内节育器处方和插入模式、他们对患者能否接触到插入宫内节育器的医生的看法,以及他们对宫内节育器插入课程的兴趣。

结果

回复率为81%。与证据相反,超过60%的家庭医生认为盆腔炎和异位妊娠是主要风险,近一半的家庭医生认为宫内节育器失效是主要风险。在过去一年中,不到三分之一的家庭医生会推荐宫内节育器作为未生育女性、性交后避孕、患有中等大小肌瘤的女性或患有盆腔炎的女性的选择,尽管根据既定临床指南,这些都不是禁忌症。约82%的家庭医生开具宫内节育器处方,41%的家庭医生进行宫内节育器插入操作。新毕业的医生比年长的医生更有可能只开具左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器(36%对8%)。约93%的调查受访者表示,患者能否接触到插入宫内节育器的医生不是向他们推荐宫内节育器的因素。

结论

相当一部分接受调查的家庭医生认为宫内节育器的副作用比临床指南所支持的更严重,并且对能够从宫内节育器中受益的女性范围了解有误。这些误解可能导致加拿大宫内节育器使用率较低。

相似文献

3
Louisiana and Mississippi Family Physicians' Contraception Counseling for Adolescents with a Focus on Intrauterine Contraception.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Oct;29(5):458-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.01.126. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
4
A national study to monitor the safety of IUCD use.
Contraception. 1993 Apr;47(4):359-66. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90033-4.
5
Primary care physicians' concerns may affect adolescents' access to intrauterine contraception.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Jul 1;4(3):216-9. doi: 10.1177/2150131912465314. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
7
The Use of ACOG Guidelines: Perceived Contraindications to IUD and Implant Use Among Family Planning Providers.
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Sep;21(9):1706-1712. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2320-1.
8
Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice.
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):275-80. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01726-4.
10
US family physicians' intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey.
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):432-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Strategies to improve the uptake of effective contraception in perinatally HIV-infected adolescents.
J Virus Erad. 2017 Jul 1;3(3):152-156. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30334-4.
3
Contraceptive challenges in adolescents living with or at risk of HIV.
J Virus Erad. 2016 Apr 1;2(2):82-6. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30474-X.
6
Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;57(4):659-73. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000059.
7
Immediate post-abortion insertion of intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) in a diverse urban population.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2014 Jun;16(3):416-21. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9762-8.
8
A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012 Oct;17(5):340-50. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2012.700744. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
9
A study of physician recommendations for reversible contraceptive methods using standardized patients.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Dec;43(4):224-9. doi: 10.1363/4322411. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
10
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: recruiting women at highest risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Dec;19(12):2233-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2146. Epub 2010 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub2.
3
Intrauterine contraception: the role of general practitioners in four Dutch general practices.
Contraception. 2004 Apr;69(4):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.12.002.
4
5
Perpetuating negative attitudes about the intrauterine device: textbooks lag behind the evidence.
Contraception. 2002 Jun;65(6):389-95. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00307-4.
6
Treatment of menorrhagia with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial resection.
Fertil Steril. 2001 Aug;76(2):304-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01909-4.
10
The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in the management of menorrhagia.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 May;104(5):614-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11542.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验