• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[颈动脉++的磁共振血管造影。低磁场设备临床结果评估]

[Angiography with magnetic resonance of the ++carotid arteries. Evaluation of clinical results obtained with low magnetic field equipment].

作者信息

Pavone P, Catalano C, Di Girolamo M, Albertini Petroni G, Marsili L, Passariello R

机构信息

Istituto di Radiologia, Università di Roma La Sapienza.

出版信息

Radiol Med. 1993 Nov;86(5):579-86.

PMID:8272541
Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is the latest diagnostic technique for the noninvasive evaluation of cardiovascular conditions. This technique has proved to be especially useful in the study of carotid arteries. All the clinical studies reported to date have been obtained at high or medium field strength; our purpose is to assess the clinical value of MRA in the evaluation of carotid arteries at low field strength. All the exams were performed with an 0.2 T permanent magnet, using the 2D time of flight (TOF) technique, the only one which is currently available on our equipment. Forty-two patients with clinical diagnosis of cerebrovascular insufficiency were examined. In all cases MRA findings were confirmed with digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which was considered the gold standard. The double-blind evaluation of the results showed high agreement of the two techniques in 70 of 84 carotid arteries. A mild tendency to overestimation was observed in 4 normal cases considered as mild stenoses on MRA, in 2 cases with mild stenosis considered as discrete stenoses on MRA and in 1 case of severe stenosis considered as an occlusion on MRA. Underestimation was seen in 1 case of mild stenosis considered as normal on MRA, in 2 cases of discrete stenosis which appeared as mild stenoses on MRA and in 2 cases of occlusion considered as severe stenoses. Our study showed high agreement between MRA and DSA results, which means that high quality exams can be obtained even at low field strength. Further progress can be expected when 3D TOF and phase-contrast techniques will be introduced.

摘要

磁共振血管造影(MRA)是用于心血管疾病无创评估的最新诊断技术。该技术已被证明在颈动脉研究中特别有用。迄今为止报道的所有临床研究均在高场或中场强度下进行;我们的目的是评估低场强下MRA在颈动脉评估中的临床价值。所有检查均使用0.2 T永磁体进行,采用二维时间飞跃(TOF)技术,这是目前我们设备上唯一可用的技术。对42例临床诊断为脑血管供血不足的患者进行了检查。在所有病例中,MRA结果均通过数字减影血管造影(DSA)得到证实,DSA被视为金标准。对结果的双盲评估显示,在84条颈动脉中的70条中,两种技术高度一致。在4例正常病例中,MRA将其视为轻度狭窄,存在轻度高估倾向;在2例轻度狭窄病例中,MRA将其视为离散狭窄;在1例严重狭窄病例中,MRA将其视为闭塞。在1例轻度狭窄病例中,MRA将其视为正常,存在低估情况;在2例离散狭窄病例中,MRA将其显示为轻度狭窄;在2例闭塞病例中,MRA将其视为严重狭窄。我们的研究表明MRA和DSA结果高度一致,这意味着即使在低场强下也能获得高质量的检查结果。当引入三维TOF和相位对比技术时,有望取得进一步进展。

相似文献

1
[Angiography with magnetic resonance of the ++carotid arteries. Evaluation of clinical results obtained with low magnetic field equipment].[颈动脉++的磁共振血管造影。低磁场设备临床结果评估]
Radiol Med. 1993 Nov;86(5):579-86.
2
[MR angiography of the carotid arteries using 3D TOF technique with sagittal double-volume acquisition using a new head-neck coil].使用新型头颈线圈进行矢状双容积采集的3D TOF技术对颈动脉进行磁共振血管造影
Rofo. 1996 Dec;165(6):544-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015809.
3
Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography.颈内动脉狭窄的检测。二维磁共振血管造影、双功扫描和动脉造影的比较。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1993 Jun;34(3):209-13.
4
Magnetic resonance angiography of extracranial carotid and vertebral arteries, including their origins: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Neuroradiology. 1992;35(1):42-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00588277.
5
Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.颅外颈动脉狭窄的前瞻性评估:最大强度投影和多平面重建磁共振血管造影与传统血管造影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1205-12. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976902.
6
[Carotid angiography by magnetic resonance].
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1993 Oct;42(8):69-75.
7
Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens.磁共振血管造影、数字减影血管造影和多普勒超声在检测颈动脉狭窄中的应用:与组织学标本检查结果的比较。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Jul;152(7):1215-21. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0645-2. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
8
Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using three different techniques: accuracy compared with intraarterial x-ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens.使用三种不同技术对颈动脉进行磁共振血管造影:与动脉内X射线血管造影和动脉内膜切除术标本相比的准确性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Apr;21(4):424-31. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20282.
9
How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?我们应该如何利用磁共振血管造影术来评估颈动脉狭窄?
Neuroradiology. 1996 May;38(4):299-305. doi: 10.1007/BF00596574.
10
Carotid bifurcation imaging: magnetic resonance angiography compared to conventional angiography and Doppler ultrasound.颈动脉分叉处成像:磁共振血管造影与传统血管造影及多普勒超声的比较
Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993 May;7(3):245-51. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80004-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review.利用磁共振血管造影术选择近期有症状的颈动脉狭窄患者进行手术:系统评价
BMJ. 2002 Jan 26;324(7331):198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7331.198.