• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人群中牙医对牙齿外观的评分与自我评分的比较。

Comparisons between dentist ratings and self-ratings of dental appearance in an elderly population.

作者信息

Matthias R E, Atchison K A, Schweitzer S O, Lubben J E, Mayer-Oakes A, De Jong F

机构信息

University of California, Los Angeles, School of Public Health.

出版信息

Spec Care Dentist. 1993 Mar-Apr;13(2):53-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1993.tb01455.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1754-4505.1993.tb01455.x
PMID:8272984
Abstract

Little is known about dental appearance in terms of the elderly population. The purpose of this paper is to compare self-reported dental appearance with dentist-rated appearance for individuals over 65. The subjects (N = 550) were participants in the Los Angeles based Medicare Screening and Health Promotion Trial. Most were female (57.3%), white (89.0%), and married (62.0%), with a mean age of 74.5 years. About one-third had incomes greater than $25,000. Results are based on a 45 minute telephone interview and onsite dental screening. Findings show that 40% of the self-ratings on a five point scale were higher than the dentist ratings, and 22% were lower. Bivariate analyses showed that both sets of ratings were related to dental status variables, self-reported health, and education. High self-ratings were also associated with being white and having a positive mental health status, while high dentist ratings were associated with patients who were younger, married, and who had higher income and social network scores. Comparison of results from two multiple regressions showed unique predictors for the self-ratings (marital status and GOHAI scores) and for the dentist ratings (sex and income). These discrepancies can raise barriers to effective treatment planning in the elderly, which could affect utilization and satisfaction.

摘要

关于老年人群的牙齿外观情况,我们所知甚少。本文的目的是比较65岁以上人群自我报告的牙齿外观与牙医评定的外观。研究对象(N = 550)是参与洛杉矶医疗保险筛查与健康促进试验的参与者。大多数为女性(57.3%)、白人(89.0%)且已婚(62.0%),平均年龄为74.5岁。约三分之一的人收入超过25,000美元。研究结果基于45分钟的电话访谈和现场牙齿筛查。研究结果显示,在五分制量表上,40%的自我评定高于牙医评定,22%的自我评定低于牙医评定。双变量分析表明,两组评定均与牙齿状况变量、自我报告的健康状况和教育程度有关。自我评定较高还与白人身份和积极的心理健康状况相关,而牙医评定较高则与年龄较小、已婚、收入较高且社交网络得分较高的患者相关。对两个多元回归结果的比较显示,自我评定(婚姻状况和GOHAI得分)和牙医评定(性别和收入)有各自独特的预测因素。这些差异可能会给老年人有效的治疗计划带来障碍,进而影响医疗服务的利用和满意度。

相似文献

1
Comparisons between dentist ratings and self-ratings of dental appearance in an elderly population.老年人群中牙医对牙齿外观的评分与自我评分的比较。
Spec Care Dentist. 1993 Mar-Apr;13(2):53-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1993.tb01455.x.
2
Comparison of oral health ratings by dentists and dentate elders.牙医与有牙老年人对口腔健康评级的比较。
J Public Health Dent. 1993 Fall;53(4):223-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1993.tb02708.x.
3
Factors affecting self-ratings of oral health.
J Public Health Dent. 1995 Fall;55(4):197-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1995.tb02370.x.
4
The relationship between dental utilization and preventive participation among a well-elderly sample.健康老年人样本中牙齿保健利用与预防参与之间的关系。
J Public Health Dent. 1993 Spring;53(2):88-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1993.tb02681.x.
5
A comparison of oral health in elderly populations seeking and not seeking dental care.寻求和未寻求牙科护理的老年人群口腔健康状况比较。
Spec Care Dentist. 1999 Nov-Dec;19(6):248-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1999.tb01393.x.
6
Self-perception of oral health in non-institutionalised elderly of Piracicaba city, Brazil.巴西皮拉西卡巴市非机构化老年人的口腔健康自我感知。
Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e281-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00464.x. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
7
Oral health-related quality of life of a population of medically compromised elderly people.患有多种疾病的老年人群的口腔健康相关生活质量。
Community Dent Health. 2002 Jun;19(2):90-7.
8
Association between self-rated oral appearance and the need for dental prostheses among elderly Brazilians.巴西老年人自评口腔外观与对义齿需求的关系。
Braz Oral Res. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):203-10. doi: 10.1590/S1806-83242013005000010.
9
Dental status, xerostomia and the oral health-related quality of life of an elderly institutionalized population.老年机构化人群的口腔状况、口干症及与口腔健康相关的生活质量
Spec Care Dentist. 2003;23(3):86-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2003.tb01667.x.
10
Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index.老年口腔健康评估指数的制定。
J Dent Educ. 1990 Nov;54(11):680-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Satisfaction with dental appearance in two cohorts of 75-year-olds examined in 2007 and 2017: A repeated cross-sectional study.2007 年和 2017 年检查的两组 75 岁老年人的牙齿外观满意度:一项重复横断面研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2022 Nov;49(11):1060-1068. doi: 10.1111/joor.13361. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
Perception of orofacial appearance among laypersons with diverse social and demographic status.不同社会和人口统计学地位的外行对口面部外观的感知。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239232. eCollection 2020.
3
Association of Self-Perceived Oral Health and Function with Clinically Determined Oral Health Status among Adults Aged 35⁻54 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study.
35-54 岁成年人自我感知口腔健康和功能与临床确定口腔健康状况的关系:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 7;15(8):1681. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081681.
4
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in institutionalized elderly in Barcelona (Spain).巴塞罗那(西班牙)机构化老年人的口腔健康相关生活质量。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Mar 1;18(2):e285-92. doi: 10.4317/medoral.18280.
5
Oral health-related quality of life among parents and teachers of disabled schoolchildren in Kuwait.科威特残疾学童的家长和教师的口腔健康相关生活质量。
Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(3):285-90. doi: 10.1159/000345213. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
6
Postextraction implant placement with immediate provisionalisation and finalisation, using a simplified technique: technical notes and a case report.采用简化技术进行拔牙后种植体植入并即刻临时修复与最终修复:技术要点及病例报告
Open Dent J. 2012;6:164-9. doi: 10.2174/1874210601206010164. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
7
Effectiveness of dental services in facilitating recovery from oral disadvantage.牙科服务在促进从口腔缺陷中康复方面的有效性。
Qual Life Res. 2005 Feb;14(1):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-3929-2.