Knight R, Buck S L
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
Vision Res. 1993 Nov;33(16):2203-13. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90100-b.
The field-adaptation properties of two scotopic (rod) mechanisms, pi 0 and pi 0', were measured to test a two-pathway model that associates the fast temporal properties of pi 0' with the processing of rod signals by early cone pathways, possibly including cone photoreceptors, and the sluggish temporal properties of pi 0 with processing of rod signals by classical rod pathways. This model predicts that cone stimulation will differentially affect the flicker sensitivity of pi 0' compared to pi 0. Both rod mechanisms are seen in double-branched flicker-threshold-vs-intensity (FTVI) curves measured with a 15-Hz, square-wave-modulated, rod-detected test stimulus. We show that the position of the upper branch (pi 0') shifts relative to the lower branch in response to changes of background wavelength, indicating that different receptor types regulate sensitivity of pi 0 and pi 0'. Field spectral sensitivity (FSS) functions for pi 0 closely match the scotopic spectral sensitivity function, indicating that only rods adapt pi 0 under these conditions. In contrast, fitting of FSS functions for pi 0' required a combination of cone and rod spectral sensitivity functions. The relative adaptational effect of cone stimulation compared to rod stimulation increases with background light level: at highest levels, cone stimulation has more influence than rod stimulation. Test additivity experiments assessed the degree of additivity between cones and rods to ensure that the pi 0' branch did not result from sub-threshold summation between receptor mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
测量了两种暗视(视杆)机制π0和π0′的场适应特性,以测试一种双通路模型。该模型将π0′的快速时间特性与早期视锥通路(可能包括视锥光感受器)对视杆信号的处理相关联,而将π0的缓慢时间特性与经典视杆通路对视杆信号的处理相关联。该模型预测,与π0相比,视锥刺激将对视杆机制π0′的闪烁敏感性产生不同影响。在用15赫兹方波调制的视杆检测测试刺激测量的双分支闪烁阈值与强度(FTVI)曲线中可以看到这两种视杆机制。我们表明,响应背景波长的变化,上分支(π0′)相对于下分支发生移动,这表明不同的感受器类型调节π0和π0′的敏感性。π0的场光谱敏感性(FSS)函数与暗视光谱敏感性函数紧密匹配,这表明在这些条件下只有视杆对视杆机制π0产生适应。相比之下,π0′的FSS函数拟合需要视锥和视杆光谱敏感性函数的组合。与视杆刺激相比,视锥刺激的相对适应效应随背景光水平增加:在最高水平时,视锥刺激比视杆刺激的影响更大。测试相加性实验评估了视锥和视杆之间的相加程度,以确保π0′分支不是由感受器机制之间的阈下总和导致的。(摘要截短于250字)