Suppr超能文献

CT在鉴别小肠梗阻与其他小肠扩张原因方面的效能。

Efficacy of CT in distinguishing small-bowel obstruction from other causes of small-bowel dilatation.

作者信息

Gazelle G S, Goldberg M A, Wittenberg J, Halpern E F, Pinkney L, Mueller P R

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jan;162(1):43-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.1.8273687.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Dilatation of the small bowel is a common finding on plain abdominal radiographs. In such cases, it is often difficult to determine if the cause of the dilatation is small-bowel obstruction, paralytic ileus, or another intraabdominal disorder. Accordingly, we studied the efficacy of CT in making this distinction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 75 patients with small-bowel dilatation seen on CT scans (more than three segments > 2.5 cm in diameter) were reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups (obstruction [27 patients], other surgical diagnosis [16 patients], and no surgery [32 patients]) on the basis of clinical course, findings at surgery, or both. CT scans were retrospectively evaluated by two gastrointestinal radiologists who did not know the results of the chart review. They evaluated the images with regard to the following specific criteria for obstruction: presence/continuity of duodenal, small-bowel, and colonic dilatation; presence of air-fluid levels; amount of intestinal fluid; presence of prestenotic dilatation; presence of transition zone; and cause of obstruction. In addition, each radiologist gave an overall impression regarding the presence or absence of obstruction (criteria not specified to the observers) and its site, or other cause of bowel dilatation. The CT interpretations of each of the radiologists were compared with the patients' subsequent clinical course.

RESULTS

Observer A was correct in 89%, 88%, and 72% of cases in the obstruction, other surgical diagnosis, and no surgery groups, respectively. Observer B was correct in 78%, 81%, and 69% of cases in the obstruction, other surgical diagnosis, and no surgery groups, respectively. Observer agreement regarding the proposed criteria for obstruction ranged from 65% to 91%. For both observers, only the presence of continuous small-bowel dilatation, prestenotic dilatation, and a transition zone correlated significantly with the presence of small-bowel obstruction.

CONCLUSION

CT can be a useful test for evaluating small-bowel dilatation and can aid both the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction and its differentiation from other conditions resulting in small-bowel dilatation.

摘要

目的

小肠扩张是腹部平片上常见的表现。在这种情况下,通常很难确定扩张的原因是小肠梗阻、麻痹性肠梗阻还是其他腹腔内疾病。因此,我们研究了CT在进行这种鉴别诊断中的有效性。

材料与方法

回顾了75例CT扫描显示小肠扩张(超过三段直径>2.5 cm)患者的病历。根据临床病程、手术所见或两者,将患者分为三组(梗阻组[27例患者]、其他外科诊断组[16例患者]和非手术组[32例患者])。由两位不了解病历审查结果的胃肠放射科医生对CT扫描进行回顾性评估。他们根据以下梗阻的具体标准评估图像:十二指肠、小肠和结肠扩张的存在/连续性;气液平面的存在;肠液量;狭窄前扩张的存在;过渡区的存在;以及梗阻原因。此外,每位放射科医生对梗阻的存在与否(未向观察者指定标准)及其部位或肠道扩张的其他原因给出总体印象。将每位放射科医生的CT诊断结果与患者随后的临床病程进行比较。

结果

观察者A在梗阻组、其他外科诊断组和非手术组中分别有89%、88%和72%的病例诊断正确。观察者B在梗阻组、其他外科诊断组和非手术组中分别有78%、81%和69%的病例诊断正确。两位观察者对提出的梗阻标准的一致性范围为65%至91%。对于两位观察者来说,只有连续的小肠扩张、狭窄前扩张和过渡区的存在与小肠梗阻的存在显著相关。

结论

CT对于评估小肠扩张是一项有用的检查,有助于小肠梗阻的诊断及其与导致小肠扩张的其他疾病的鉴别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验