• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右冠状动脉狭窄对左主干或左主干等同病变患者运动试验反应及生存的影响。

Influence of right coronary artery stenosis on exercise test responses and survival in patients with left main or left main equivalent disease.

作者信息

Kawaguchi T, Myers J, Ribisl P M, Morris C K, Ueshima K, Liu J H, Froelicher V F

机构信息

Palo Alto, VA Medical Center, CA 94304.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1994 Jan;127(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90507-x.

DOI:10.1016/0002-8703(94)90507-x
PMID:8273754
Abstract

Forty-two patients with angiographically documented left main coronary artery (LM) disease (luminal occlusion > or = 50%) and 30 patients with left main equivalent (LMEQ) disease (> or = 70% luminal occlusion of both the proximal left anterior descending artery and proximal left circumflex artery) were studied to determine the role of right coronary artery (RCA) involvement on exercise test responses and survival. Significant (> or = 70%) RCA stenosis was present in 30 (72%) of the 42 LM patients and 16 (53%) of the 30 LMEQ patients. No significant differences were observed between LM and LMEQ patients in any clinical or exercise variables or survival. Thus both groups were combined for analysis of the influence of RCA involvement (i.e., LM/LMEQ with RCA versus LM/LMEQ without RCA disease). Greater ischemic responses were observed in the LM/LMEQ group with significant stenosis of the RCA. The presence of RCA stenosis was associated with significantly greater horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression during exercise (2.4 +/- 1.2 mm vs 1.3 +/- 1.4 mm; p < 0.001), and prolonged recovery time until normalization of the ST segment (3.2 +/- 1.4 min vs 2.0 +/- 1.9 min; p < 0.01). The LM/LMEQ without RCA disease group behaved like the subgroup with two-vessel disease, and responses of the LM/LMEQ group with RCA disease were similar to the group with three-vessel disease. The annual survival in LM/LMEQ with RCA disease was worse than that in LM/LMEQ without RCA disease (average annual mortality rates = 7.5% vs 1.0%, respectively; p = 0.05). Infarct-free survival in LM/LMEQ with RCA disease was also lower than that in LM/LMEQ without RCA disease. Thus although patients with LM and LMEQ were similar in terms of survival and exercise responses, the presence of RCA stenosis was associated with significantly greater ST-segment depression, a prolonged recovery time until normalization of the ST segment, a fivefold increase in the death rate, and higher morbidity from myocardial infarction over a 5-year period of follow-up. Involvement of the RCA should be considered when making decisions concerning medical-surgical management of patients with severe coronary artery disease.

摘要

对42例经血管造影证实有左冠状动脉主干(LM)病变(管腔闭塞≥50%)的患者和30例有左主干等同病变(LMEQ)(左前降支近端和左旋支近端管腔闭塞≥70%)的患者进行了研究,以确定右冠状动脉(RCA)受累对运动试验反应和生存的影响。42例LM患者中有30例(72%)存在显著(≥70%)的RCA狭窄,30例LMEQ患者中有16例(53%)存在显著RCA狭窄。在任何临床、运动变量或生存率方面,LM患者和LMEQ患者之间均未观察到显著差异。因此,将两组合并以分析RCA受累的影响(即有RCA病变的LM/LMEQ与无RCA病变的LM/LMEQ)。在RCA有显著狭窄的LM/LMEQ组中观察到更大的缺血反应。RCA狭窄的存在与运动期间显著更大的水平或下斜型ST段压低相关(2.4±1.2 mm对1.3±1.4 mm;p<0.001),以及直到ST段恢复正常的恢复时间延长(3.2±1.4分钟对2.0±1.9分钟;p<0.01)。无RCA病变的LM/LMEQ组表现类似于双支血管病变亚组,有RCA病变的LM/LMEQ组的反应类似于三支血管病变组。有RCA病变的LM/LMEQ的年生存率低于无RCA病变的LM/LMEQ(平均年死亡率分别为7.5%对1.0%;p=0.05)。有RCA病变的LM/LMEQ的无梗死生存率也低于无RCA病变的LM/LMEQ。因此,尽管LM和LMEQ患者在生存和运动反应方面相似,但RCA狭窄的存在与显著更大的ST段压低、直到ST段恢复正常的恢复时间延长、死亡率增加五倍以及在5年随访期内心肌梗死发病率更高相关。在对严重冠状动脉疾病患者进行药物 - 手术治疗决策时,应考虑RCA受累情况。

相似文献

1
Influence of right coronary artery stenosis on exercise test responses and survival in patients with left main or left main equivalent disease.右冠状动脉狭窄对左主干或左主干等同病变患者运动试验反应及生存的影响。
Am Heart J. 1994 Jan;127(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90507-x.
2
Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main equivalent coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience.左主干等效冠状动脉疾病患者手术组与药物治疗组生存率的比较。冠心病外科研究(CASS)长期经验。
Circulation. 1995 May 1;91(9):2335-44. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.9.2335.
3
Predictors of disease severity and survival in patients with coronary artery disease.冠心病患者疾病严重程度和生存的预测因素
Coron Artery Dis. 1993 Nov;4(11):971-80. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199311000-00004.
4
Clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients with combined anterior and inferior ST-segment elevation on the initial electrocardiogram during acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死期间初始心电图表现为前壁和下壁ST段联合抬高患者的临床及血管造影特征
Am Heart J. 2003 Oct;146(4):653-61. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00369-7.
5
Correlation of remote ST segment depression and coronary anatomy during acute coronary occlusion.急性冠状动脉闭塞时远程ST段压低与冠状动脉解剖结构的相关性
Can J Cardiol. 2001 Mar;17(3):282-90.
6
Exercise testing and left main coronary artery stenosis. Can patients with left main disease be identified?运动试验与左主干冠状动脉狭窄。能否识别患有左主干病变的患者?
Chest. 1991 Jul;100(1):227-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.1.227.
7
Relation of T-wave polarity in precordial V1 lead to right or left circumflex coronary pathoanatomy in acute inferior myocardial infarction.急性下壁心肌梗死时胸前V1导联T波极性与右冠状动脉或左旋支冠状动脉病理解剖的关系。
Chest. 1994 Feb;105(2):360-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.2.360.
8
The role of coronary bypass surgery for 'left main equivalent' coronary disease: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study registry.
Circulation. 1986 Nov;74(5 Pt 2):III17-25.
9
[Significance of electrocardiographic projection of ST-segment depression during exercise test in the prediction of the location of regional myocardial ischemia].[运动试验中ST段压低的心电图投影在预测局部心肌缺血部位中的意义]
Cardiologia. 1998 Mar;43(3):273-9.
10
Diagnostic performance of standard electrocardiogram for prediction of infarct related artery and site of coronary occlusion in unselected STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.标准心电图对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非选择性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者梗死相关动脉及冠状动脉闭塞部位的预测诊断性能。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Dec;3(4):326-39. doi: 10.1177/2048872614530665. Epub 2014 Apr 14.