Sanders A B, Berg R A, Burress M, Genova R T, Kern K B, Ewy G A
Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine.
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jan;23(1):56-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70009-5.
To determine whether an advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) course in a rural hospital will improve resuscitation success from cardiac arrest.
A retrospective case review of all patients in cardiac arrest during a 13-month period before and after the institution of an ACLS training program.
Emergency department of a 42-bed rural, community hospital in a community with no prehospital advanced life support or early defibrillation.
All patients in cardiac arrest were entered into the data base. Twenty-nine patients were included in the pre-ACLS period and 35 in the post-ACLS period. There were no significant differences in age, gender, initial rhythm, comorbid diseases, witnessed versus unwitnessed arrest, or total arrest time in the patients in the pre-ACLS period compared with those in the post-ACLS period.
ACLS provider training.
Patients in cardiac arrest who had ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia as their initial rhythm had significant improvement in resuscitation success compared with patients in ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia in the pre-ACLS period (six of 15 versus none of nine, P < .05). Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation was more successful in the post-ACLS period than in the pre-ACLS period (five of 30 versus none of 25, P < .05). Overall, seven of 35 patients (20%) were resuscitated successfully in the post-ACLS period, with two patients surviving to hospital discharge. This was not significantly different than the two of 29 patients (7%) resuscitated in the pre-ACLS period, with one patient surviving to discharge.
The institution of an ACLS-provider course in a rural community hospital was associated with improvement in initial resuscitation for patients with ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia and out-of-hospital arrest.
确定农村医院的高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)课程是否会提高心脏骤停复苏的成功率。
对ACLS培训项目实施前后13个月期间所有心脏骤停患者进行回顾性病例分析。
一家拥有42张床位的农村社区医院急诊科,该社区没有院前高级生命支持或早期除颤服务。
所有心脏骤停患者均纳入数据库。ACLS实施前有29例患者,实施后有35例患者。与ACLS实施后的患者相比,ACLS实施前的患者在年龄、性别、初始心律、合并疾病、目击与非目击骤停或总骤停时间方面无显著差异。
ACLS提供者培训。
初始心律为心室颤动/心动过速的心脏骤停患者与ACLS实施前心室颤动/心动过速患者相比,复苏成功率有显著提高(15例中有6例成功,而9例中无一例成功,P <.05)。院外心脏骤停复苏在ACLS实施后比实施前更成功(30例中有5例成功,而25例中无一例成功,P <.05)。总体而言,ACLS实施后35例患者中有7例(20%)成功复苏,2例存活至出院。这与ACLS实施前29例患者中有2例(7%)成功复苏且1例存活至出院相比无显著差异。
农村社区医院开展ACLS提供者课程与心室颤动/心动过速患者及院外心脏骤停患者的初始复苏改善有关。