Vonderheid E C, Diamond L W, van Vloten W A, Scheffer E, Meijer C J, Cashell A W, Hardman J M, Lai S M, Hermans J, Matthews M J
Division of Dermatology, Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102.
Cancer. 1994 Jan 1;73(1):207-18. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940101)73:1<207::aid-cncr2820730136>3.0.co;2-c.
This study was undertaken to compare three classification schemes used to evaluate lymph nodes (LN) obtained from patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL): a modified Rappaport classification, the National Cancer Institute-Veterans Administration (NCI-VA) classification based on the relative numbers of cerebriform cells in the paracortical areas, and the Dutch classification based on the presence of cerebriform cells with large nuclei in mycosis fungoides (MF) and diffuse infiltration by cerebriform cells in Sézary syndrome.
A study set of 195 LN obtained from patients with CTCL (MF, Sézary syndrome, and nonepidermotropic T-cell lymphomas) and 14 LN from patients with benign dermatoses was reviewed independently by three groups of pathologists familiar with each classification system.
Each classification system provided useful prognostic information. However, contrary to prior reports, no significant difference in survival was apparent in patients with uneffaced LN when classified according to the NCI-VA (LN0-2 versus LN3) or Dutch (Gr0-1 versus Gr2) ratings. In addition, all classification systems demonstrated a poor survival time associated with effaced LN. By combining results from the modified Rappaport and Dutch classifications, three prognostic groups could be identified based on cell morphology: a low-grade category with a small cell histologic subtype (median survival time, 40 months); a high-grade immunoblastic subtype (median survival time, 9 months) composed of cells with an oval nucleus containing a large, usually solitary central nucleolus; and an intermediate-grade category composed of all cases without the distinctive small cell and immunoblastic morphologies (median survival time, 26 months).
The authors propose that clearly involved LN in CTCL can be categorized on the basis of cell morphology into prognostic groups analogous to what has been proposed for the Working Formulation for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas for Clinical Usage.
本研究旨在比较用于评估皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤(CTCL)患者所获淋巴结(LN)的三种分类方案:改良的Rappaport分类、基于副皮质区脑回状细胞相对数量的美国国立癌症研究所-退伍军人管理局(NCI-VA)分类,以及基于蕈样肉芽肿(MF)中具有大核的脑回状细胞的存在情况和Sezary综合征中脑回状细胞弥漫浸润情况的荷兰分类。
一组由熟悉每种分类系统的三组病理学家独立审查了从CTCL患者(MF、Sezary综合征和非亲表皮性T细胞淋巴瘤)获得的195个LN研究集以及从良性皮肤病患者获得的14个LN。
每种分类系统都提供了有用的预后信息。然而,与先前的报告相反,根据NCI-VA(LN0-2与LN3)或荷兰(Gr0-1与Gr2)分级对未消退LN的患者进行分类时,生存率无明显差异。此外,所有分类系统都显示出与消退LN相关的生存时间较差。通过结合改良的Rappaport分类和荷兰分类的结果,可根据细胞形态确定三个预后组:小细胞组织学亚型的低级别组(中位生存时间,40个月);由具有椭圆形核且含有大的、通常为单个中央核仁的细胞组成的高级别免疫母细胞亚型(中位生存时间,9个月);以及由所有无独特小细胞和免疫母细胞形态的病例组成的中级别组(中位生存时间,26个月)。
作者建议,CTCL中明确受累的LN可根据细胞形态分类为预后组,类似于非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床应用工作方案所提出的分类。