Olié J P, Galinowski A, Lehert P, Lemonnier F, Lôo H
Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Santé Mentale et de Thérapeutique, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris.
Encephale. 1993 Jul-Aug;19(4):333-40.
Medifoxamine (Clédial TM), a non tricyclic non MAOI antidepressant drug with a dopaminergic and serotoninergic mechanism of action, was compared to imipramine in a multicenter double blind trial. Patients suffering from DSM III-R major depression (without psychotic features), with a minimum inclusion score of 25 at the MADRS after an initial 7-day wash-out period, were randomly assigned to a 4-week treatment by either imipramine or medifoxamine, with flexible doses of at least 100 mg after 2 weeks of treatment. No associated treatment was permitted except for lorazepam 2 to 5 mg per day. Ninety eight patients were recruited by 20 centers throughout France. Eighty four terminated the 4-week protocol. Early terminations were due to serious adverse events (3), death on imipramine (1), protocol violation (1), refusal to continue (1), loss to follow up (1). The 2 groups of patients were comparable on inclusion. In the medifoxamine group (receiving a daily dose of 194 mg at day 28) the percentage of improvement in MADRS scores, the number of patients with a MADRS improvement of a least 50% and a final MADRS score inferior to 8, were not significantly different from the imipramine group (daily dose: 161 mg at day 28). No more difference appeared when several clinical variables were analyzed, in particular the DSM III-R melancholic, the Newcastle endogenous subtypes and the in or out patient status. The two treatment groups were also comparable on other scales (HDRS, HARS assessing anxiety, CGI).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
美地沙明(Clédial TM)是一种具有多巴胺能和5-羟色胺能作用机制的非三环类、非单胺氧化酶抑制剂的抗抑郁药,在一项多中心双盲试验中与丙咪嗪进行了比较。患有DSM III-R重度抑郁症(无精神病性特征)、在最初7天洗脱期后MADRS最低纳入分数为25的患者,被随机分配接受丙咪嗪或美地沙明为期4周的治疗,治疗2周后剂量灵活调整至至少100mg。除每天2至5mg劳拉西泮外,不允许进行其他联合治疗。法国各地的20个中心招募了98名患者。84名患者完成了4周方案。早期终止是由于严重不良事件(3例)、丙咪嗪治疗期间死亡(1例)、违反方案(1例)、拒绝继续(1例)、失访(1例)。两组患者在纳入时具有可比性。在美地沙明组(第28天每日剂量为194mg),MADRS评分改善百分比、MADRS改善至少50%且最终MADRS评分低于8分的患者数量,与丙咪嗪组(第28天每日剂量:161mg)无显著差异。分析多个临床变量时,尤其是DSM III-R忧郁症、纽卡斯尔内源性亚型以及门诊或住院状态,未出现更多差异。两个治疗组在其他量表(HDRS、评估焦虑的HARS、CGI)上也具有可比性。(摘要截断于250字)