Suppr超能文献

丙咪嗪治疗伴有精神病性症状与无精神病性症状抑郁症的疗效比较

Efficacy of imipramine in psychotic versus nonpsychotic depression.

作者信息

Birkenhager Tom K, van den Broek Walter W, Mulder Paul G, Moleman Peter, Bruijn Jan A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;28(2):166-70. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318166c51c.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to compare the efficacy of imipramine in the treatment of psychotic versus nonpsychotic depression. Previous studies report varying results of monotherapy with antidepressants in psychotic depression. Because psychotic depression is seriously underinvestigated, performing a post hoc analysis of randomized clinical trials consisting of both psychotic and nonpsychotic depressed patients may contribute to the discussion on the optimal treatment of depressed patients with mood-congruent psychotic features. A total of 112 patients diagnosed with major depression (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) (40 with psychotic depression and 82 without psychotic features) received treatment with imipramine for 6 weeks after a washout period of 7 days. Imipramine doses were adjusted to attain a predefined fixed plasma level. Treatment response was assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). A logistic regression analysis showed a significantly larger reduction in HAM-D score in the sample with psychotic features compared with the nonpsychotic sample (regression coefficient, -3.47; SE, 1.7; P = 0.04). According to the primary outcome criterion, that is, the change in HAM-D score, imipramine was significantly more effective in the sample with psychotic depression compared with the nonpsychotic depressed patients. The contradiction between our results and those of several previous studies may be due to the fixed plasma level dosing of imipramine refraining from concurrent psychotropic medication or limiting our patient sample to patients with mood-congruent psychotic features.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较丙咪嗪治疗伴有精神病性症状的抑郁症与非精神病性抑郁症的疗效。先前的研究报告了抗抑郁药单药治疗精神病性抑郁症的不同结果。由于精神病性抑郁症的研究严重不足,对包含精神病性和非精神病性抑郁症患者的随机临床试验进行事后分析,可能有助于讨论对伴有心境一致的精神病性特征的抑郁症患者的最佳治疗方法。共有112例被诊断为重度抑郁症(《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版)的患者(40例患有精神病性抑郁症,82例无精神病性特征)在7天的洗脱期后接受了丙咪嗪治疗6周。调整丙咪嗪剂量以达到预先设定的固定血浆水平。使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)评估治疗反应。逻辑回归分析显示,与非精神病性样本相比,伴有精神病性特征的样本中HAM-D评分的降低幅度显著更大(回归系数,-3.47;标准误,1.7;P = 0.04)。根据主要结局标准,即HAM-D评分的变化,与非精神病性抑郁症患者相比,丙咪嗪治疗伴有精神病性抑郁症的样本显著更有效。我们的结果与先前几项研究结果之间的矛盾可能是由于丙咪嗪固定血浆水平给药避免了同时使用精神药物,或将我们的患者样本限制为伴有心境一致的精神病性特征的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验