Okin P M, Roman M J, Devereux R B, Borer J S, Kligfield P
Department of Medicine, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York 10021.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Jan;23(1):133-40. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90511-8.
This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the time-voltage integral of the QRS complex can improve the electrocardiographic (ECG) identification of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Standard ECG criteria have exhibited poor sensitivity for left ventricular hypertrophy at acceptable levels of specificity. However, left ventricular mass may be more closely related to the time-voltage integral of the summed left ventricular dipole than to QRS duration or voltages used in standard ECG criteria.
Standard 12-lead ECGs, orthogonal lead signal-averaged ECGs and echocardiograms were obtained in 62 male control subjects without left ventricular hypertrophy and 51 men with left ventricular hypertrophy defined by echocardiographic criteria (indexed left ventricular mass > 125 g/m2). Voltage of the QRS complex was integrated over the total QRS duration in leads X, Y and Z to calculate the time-voltage integral of each orthogonal lead, of the maximal spatial vector complex and of the horizontal, frontal and sagittal plane vector complexes.
At matched specificity of 99%, the 73% (37 of 51) sensitivity of the time-voltage integral of the vector QRS complex in the horizontal plane was significantly greater than the 10% sensitivity of the Romhilt-Estes point score, the 16% sensitivity of QRS duration alone, the 22% sensitivity of Cornell voltage, the 33% sensitivity of the 12-lead sum of QRS voltage and the 37% sensitivity of Sokolow-Lyon voltage (each p < 0.001). Sensitivity of the horizontal plane time-voltage integral was also greater than the 10% to 51% sensitivity of the time-voltage integral calculated in the individual X, Y or Z leads (p < 0.01 to < 0.001), the 18% and 35% sensitivity of the time-voltage integrals of the frontal and sagittal plane vectors (p < 0.001) and the 49% sensitivity of the time-voltage integral of the maximal spatial vector complex calculated from all three orthogonal leads (p < 0.001). Comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves confirmed that the superior performance of the horizontal plane time-voltage integral relative to standard and other signal-averaged criteria was independent of partition value selection.
These findings suggest that use of the time-voltage integral of the QRS complex, a method that can be readily implemented on commercially available computerized ECG systems, can improve the accuracy of ECG methods for the identification of left ventricular hypertrophy.
本研究旨在验证以下假设,即QRS波群的时间 - 电压积分可改善心电图(ECG)对左心室肥厚的识别。
在可接受的特异性水平下,标准ECG标准对左心室肥厚的敏感性较差。然而,左心室质量可能与左心室总偶极子的时间 - 电压积分比与标准ECG标准中使用的QRS波持续时间或电压更密切相关。
对62名无左心室肥厚的男性对照受试者和51名经超声心动图标准定义为左心室肥厚(左心室质量指数>125 g/m²)的男性进行标准12导联ECG、正交导联信号平均ECG和超声心动图检查。在导联X、Y和Z中,将QRS波群的电压在整个QRS波持续时间上进行积分,以计算每个正交导联、最大空间向量复合波以及水平、额面和矢状面向量复合波的时间 - 电压积分。
在匹配的99%特异性下,水平面向量QRS波群时间 - 电压积分的73%(51例中的37例)敏感性显著高于Romhilt - Estes积分的10%敏感性、单独QRS波持续时间的16%敏感性、Cornell电压的22%敏感性、12导联QRS波电压总和的33%敏感性以及Sokolow - Lyon电压的37%敏感性(各p<0.001)。水平面时间 - 电压积分的敏感性也高于在单个X、Y或Z导联中计算的时间 - 电压积分的10%至51%敏感性(p<0.01至<0.0(此处疑似有误,应为<0.001))、额面和矢状面向量时间 - 电压积分的18%和35%敏感性(p<0.001)以及由所有三个正交导联计算的最大空间向量复合波时间 - 电压积分的49%敏感性(p<0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线比较证实,水平面时间 - 电压积分相对于标准和其他信号平均标准的优越性能与分割值选择无关。
这些发现表明,使用QRS波群的时间 - 电压积分(一种可在市售计算机化ECG系统上轻松实现的方法)可以提高ECG方法识别左心室肥厚的准确性。