Eisenthal S, Stoeckle J D, Ehrlich C M
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Acad Med. 1994 Jan;69(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199401000-00014.
To describe the attitudes of residents in general medicine to the psychosocial dimensions of primary care and to evaluate the influences of selected variables.
A cross-sectional analysis-of-variance design (two training programs involving residents in all three residency years) was used in the analysis of 21 psychosocial attitude items from a survey questionnaire completed by general medicine residents. In 1991-92, 77 general medicine residents in ambulatory care group practices associated with the Massachusetts General Hospital were surveyed. Eighteen of the residents were in a primary care program (PCP), and 59 were in a traditional medicine program (TMP).
The overall response rate was 82% (63 of 77 residents), with slightly lower rates for four items. The residents' attitudes to the psychosocial role of the primary care physician were positive but with reservations: 55 (87%) endorsed asking psychosocial questions, while only 28 (44%) indicated that most internists felt competent to diagnose and treat. Most residents did not feel defensive about enacting the role (neither uncomfortable asking questions in ambulatory care settings, 58, 92%; nor nosey, 56, 89%; nor personally interfering, 47, 76%). Fifty-two residents (83%) perceived patients to be receptive to psychosocial questions, yet 31 (49%) indicated that patients were resistant to psychosocial attributions, and 48 (76%) indicated that patients need to be prompted to talk about life problems. The clearest and strongest influence on attitudes was setting: ambulatory care over inpatient (p < .0001). Overall, the responses of the residents from the PCP and TMP were more similar than different.
The residents accepted the psychosocial role of the primary care physician, found it most appropriate in ambulatory care settings, felt ambivalent about their ability to carry it out, and assigned it a secondary priority in patient care. To interest residents in primary care, more training should be based in ambulatory care settings and more emphasis should be placed on improving residents' competency in psychosocial skills.
描述普通内科住院医师对初级保健中社会心理层面的态度,并评估所选变量的影响。
采用横断面方差分析设计(涉及所有三年住院医师培训项目的两个培训计划),对普通内科住院医师填写的调查问卷中的21项社会心理态度项目进行分析。1991 - 1992年,对与麻省总医院相关的门诊护理组实践中的77名普通内科住院医师进行了调查。其中18名住院医师参加了初级保健项目(PCP),59名参加了传统医学项目(TMP)。
总体回复率为82%(77名住院医师中的63名),四项内容的回复率略低。住院医师对初级保健医生社会心理角色的态度积极但有所保留:55名(87%)认可询问社会心理问题,而只有28名(44%)表示大多数内科医生认为自己有能力进行诊断和治疗。大多数住院医师在履行这一角色时并不觉得有压力(在门诊护理环境中询问问题时既不感到不舒服,58名,92%;也不觉得爱管闲事,56名,89%;也不觉得是个人干涉,47名,76%)。52名住院医师(83%)认为患者愿意接受社会心理问题,但31名(49%)表示患者对社会心理归因有抵触,48名(76%)表示需要促使患者谈论生活问题。对态度最明显、最强烈的影响因素是环境:门诊护理环境优于住院环境(p < .0001)。总体而言,PCP组和TMP组住院医师的回答相似之处多于不同之处。
住院医师接受初级保健医生的社会心理角色,认为其在门诊护理环境中最为合适,对自己履行该角色的能力感到矛盾,并在患者护理中将其列为次要优先事项。为了提高住院医师对初级保健的兴趣,应更多地在门诊护理环境中开展培训,并更加强调提高住院医师的社会心理技能水平。