• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Epi-Lock与生理盐水敷料治疗压疮的比较。

A comparison of Epi-Lock and saline dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers.

作者信息

Kraft M R, Lawson L, Pohlmann B, Reid-Lokos C, Barder L

出版信息

Decubitus. 1993 Nov;6(6):42-4, 46, 48.

PMID:8286026
Abstract

The use of Epi-Lock dressings was compared to moist saline dressings as a treatment for Stage II and III pressure ulcers in 38 patients. Demographic and clinical data were collected at the onset of the investigation. At the time of enrollment and during weeks six, 12 and 24, pressure ulcers were inspected and measured, and laboratory data were collected. More healing occurred with Epi-Lock dressing than with moist saline dressing for Stage II and III pressure ulcers. Although individual Epi-Lock dressings were more expensive than saline dressings, they required less dressing changes. Therefore considering cost of nursing time, Epi-Lock dressings are more cost effective.

摘要

在38例患者中,对使用Epi-Lock敷料和湿生理盐水敷料治疗II期和III期压疮进行了比较。在调查开始时收集了人口统计学和临床数据。在入组时以及第6周、12周和24周期间,对压疮进行检查和测量,并收集实验室数据。对于II期和III期压疮,使用Epi-Lock敷料比使用湿生理盐水敷料愈合得更多。虽然单个Epi-Lock敷料比生理盐水敷料更昂贵,但更换敷料的次数更少。因此,考虑到护理时间成本,Epi-Lock敷料更具成本效益。

相似文献

1
A comparison of Epi-Lock and saline dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers.Epi-Lock与生理盐水敷料治疗压疮的比较。
Decubitus. 1993 Nov;6(6):42-4, 46, 48.
2
A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.两种压力性溃疡管理方法的疗效与成本效益比较。
Decubitus. 1993 Jul;6(4):28-36.
3
Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.压疮——比较水胶体敷料和盐水纱布敷料的随机对照试验
Med J Malaysia. 1998 Dec;53(4):428-31.
4
[Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].[与传统治疗相比,潮湿环境治疗的有效性和成本比较。对患有下肢静脉溃疡和压疮的初级护理患者的临床试验]
Rev Enferm. 2000 Jan;23(1):17-24.
5
A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.一项前瞻性随机临床试验,旨在评估现代泡沫敷料与传统盐水纱布敷料在治疗II期压疮方面的成本效益。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009 Feb;55(2):50-5.
6
Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.一种新型合成聚合物片状伤口敷料的临床疗效及成本效益
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999 Oct;45(10):41, 44-6, 48-49.
7
Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.水胶体敷料与生理盐水纱布敷料治疗压疮的成本效益分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 May;73(5):463-9.
8
Acemannan hydrogel dressing versus saline dressing for pressure ulcers. A randomized, controlled trial.乙酰甘露聚糖水凝胶敷料与生理盐水敷料治疗压疮的随机对照试验
Adv Wound Care. 1998 Oct;11(6):273-6.
9
Diabetic foot ulcerations. A controlled, randomized comparison of two moist wound healing protocols: Carrasyn Hydrogel Wound dressing and wet-to-moist saline gauze.糖尿病足溃疡。两种湿性伤口愈合方案的对照、随机比较:卡拉斯因水凝胶伤口敷料与湿对湿生理盐水纱布。
Adv Wound Care. 1998 Nov-Dec;11(7 Suppl):1-4.
10
Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores.生物膜水凝胶敷料:治疗压疮的临床评估
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1990 Jul-Aug;29:47-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for pressure ulcers: a summary of evidence for prevention and treatment.压力性溃疡的干预措施:预防与治疗的证据总结
Spinal Cord. 2018 Mar;56(3):186-198. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0054-y. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
2
Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.用于治疗压疮的敷料和外用剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD011947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011947.pub2.
3
Interactive wound dressings. A practical guide to their use in older patients.交互式伤口敷料。老年患者使用指南。
Drugs Aging. 1997 Oct;11(4):271-84. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199711040-00003.