Makker H K, Montefort S, Holgate S
Dept of University Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, UK.
Eur Respir J. 1993 Oct;6(9):1402-8.
Local airway challenge has advantages over inhalation bronchial challenge as the response of the airway can be restricted and directly observed. It has been safely performed in subjects with mild or moderate asthma, either by the direct instillation of challenge solution to the selected segmental airways via a bronchoscope, or delivered to an airway segment isolated with a double-balloon catheter. However, these techniques carry potential complications, such as generalized wheeze, and due care is required in selection of subjects. Most investigators have used the method for studying the airway events following allergen challenge. Others have studied the airway changes following challenge with non-allergen provocation agents, such as hypertonic saline, adenosine 5'-monophosphate and cold dry air. The method has helped to define changes in the inflammatory cells and mediators in relation to early and late airway responses to allergen. Similarly, study of airway events following local challenge with hypertonic solution has provided useful knowledge in understanding the mechanisms of exercise-induced asthma. With more experience and an improved margin of safety, it will be possible to study local changes in airway physiology following local airway challenge. Finally, the techniques also have potential use for studying the airway events following provocation with a wide range of agents of potential relevance to the pathogenesis of asthma.
局部气道激发试验相较于吸入支气管激发试验具有优势,因为气道反应可受到限制并能直接观察到。对于轻度或中度哮喘患者,该试验已安全实施,方法是通过支气管镜将激发溶液直接滴注到选定的节段性气道,或者通过双球囊导管将其输送至隔离的气道节段。然而,这些技术存在潜在并发症,如全身性哮鸣,因此在受试者选择上需要格外谨慎。大多数研究人员使用该方法来研究变应原激发后的气道事件。其他人则研究了用非变应原激发剂(如高渗盐水、5'-单磷酸腺苷和冷干燥空气)激发后的气道变化。该方法有助于确定与变应原早期和晚期气道反应相关的炎症细胞和介质的变化。同样,对高渗溶液局部激发后气道事件的研究为理解运动性哮喘的机制提供了有用的知识。随着经验的增加和安全性的提高,有可能研究局部气道激发试验后气道生理的局部变化。最后,这些技术在研究用多种可能与哮喘发病机制相关的激发剂激发后的气道事件方面也具有潜在用途。