Poulin R A, Steil G M, Moore D M, Ader M, Bergman R N
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033.
Diabetes. 1994 Feb;43(2):180-90. doi: 10.2337/diab.43.2.180.
We previously reported a striking similarity between the dynamics of both glucose turnover and thoracic duct lymph insulin during euglycemic clamps (J Clin Invest 84:1620, 1989), which suggested that transendothelial insulin transport (TET) is rate-limiting for insulin action in vivo. Thoracic duct lymph, however, is primarily derived from insulin-insensitive tissues, which raises questions as to the physiological significance of this relationship. The relationship between glucose turnover and TET was thus examined in insulin-sensitive tissues by the simultaneous measurement of insulin in plasma, thoracic duct lymph, and hindlimb lymph during euglycemic clamps in normal anesthetized dogs (n = 8). Clamps consisted of two 3-h phases: a 0.6 mU.min-1.kg-1 insulin infusion (activation phase) followed by termination of the insulin infusion (deactivation phase). Lymph insulin was less than plasma insulin during both phases (P < 0.01) with steady-state hindlimb (120 +/- 12 pM) and thoracic duct lymph insulin (138 +/- 12 pM) 38 and 45%, respectively, lower than steady-state plasma insulin (222 +/- 24 pM) at the end of the activation phase (P < 0.05). Also, the rate of increase of lymph insulin was slower than plasma insulin during hormone infusion; half-time to steady-state was 8.8 +/- 2.0 min for plasma insulin, but longer for thoracic (25.8 +/- 3.5) and hindlimb lymph insulin (40.7 +/- 5.7 min). A very close relationship was observed during activation between the rate of increase of glucose uptake (Rd) and the increase in hindlimb lymph insulin (r2 = 0.92); this relationship was weaker for thoracic lymph (r2 = 0.74) and much weaker between glucose uptake and plasma insulin (r2 = 0.35). These data support the concept that interstitial insulin (represented by hindlimb lymph) is the signal that determines glucose uptake by insulin-sensitive tissues and that the rate of increase of glucose uptake is determined by transendothelial insulin transport into insulin-sensitive tissue. Also, during activation, hindlimb lymph insulin was a very strong predictor of the rate of suppression of hepatic glucose output (HGO) (r2 = 0.96), and the correlation with HGO was stronger than that for thoracic lymph (r2 = 0.85). The evidence that the rate of increase of Rd and the rate of suppression of HGO during insulin infusion are very strongly predicted by the time course of insulin in hindlimb lymph is consistent with the single-gateway hypothesis: the insulin transport rate across endothelium in insulin-sensitive tissue (skeletal muscle) determines the rate of glucose utilization and the suppression of hepatic glucose output.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
我们之前报道过,在正常血糖钳夹期间,葡萄糖代谢率与胸导管淋巴胰岛素的动态变化之间存在显著相似性(《临床研究杂志》84:1620, 1989),这表明跨内皮胰岛素转运(TET)是体内胰岛素作用的限速环节。然而,胸导管淋巴主要来源于胰岛素不敏感组织,这就引发了关于这种关系的生理意义的疑问。因此,在正常麻醉犬(n = 8)的正常血糖钳夹期间,通过同时测量血浆、胸导管淋巴和后肢淋巴中的胰岛素,研究了胰岛素敏感组织中葡萄糖代谢率与TET之间的关系。钳夹包括两个3小时阶段:0.6 mU·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹胰岛素输注(激活阶段),随后停止胰岛素输注(失活阶段)。在两个阶段中,淋巴胰岛素均低于血浆胰岛素(P < 0.01),激活阶段结束时,后肢稳态淋巴胰岛素(120 ± 12 pM)和胸导管淋巴胰岛素(138 ± 12 pM)分别比稳态血浆胰岛素(222 ± 24 pM)低38%和45%(P < 0.05)。此外,在激素输注期间,淋巴胰岛素的增加速率比血浆胰岛素慢;血浆胰岛素达到稳态的半衰期为8.8 ± 2.0分钟,而胸导管淋巴胰岛素(25.8 ± 3.5分钟)和后肢淋巴胰岛素(40.7 ± 5.7分钟)的半衰期更长。在激活期间,观察到葡萄糖摄取率(Rd)的增加速率与后肢淋巴胰岛素的增加之间存在非常密切的关系(r² = 0.92);胸导管淋巴的这种关系较弱(r² = 0.74),而葡萄糖摄取与血浆胰岛素之间的关系则更弱(r² = 0.35)。这些数据支持这样的概念,即间质胰岛素(以后肢淋巴为代表)是决定胰岛素敏感组织葡萄糖摄取的信号,并且葡萄糖摄取率的增加速率由跨内皮胰岛素转运到胰岛素敏感组织的速率决定。此外,在激活期间,后肢淋巴胰岛素是肝葡萄糖输出(HGO)抑制率的非常强的预测指标(r² = 0.96),并且与HGO的相关性比胸导管淋巴更强(r² = 0.85)。胰岛素输注期间Rd的增加速率和HGO的抑制率由后肢淋巴中胰岛素的时间进程非常强烈地预测,这一证据与单通道假说一致:胰岛素敏感组织(骨骼肌)中跨内皮的胰岛素转运速率决定了葡萄糖利用速率和肝葡萄糖输出的抑制。(摘要截取自400字)