• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订国家从业者数据库报告要求:小额索赔能否预测大额索赔?

Amending the National Practitioner Data Bank reporting requirements: are small claims predictive of large claims?

作者信息

Rolph J E, Pekelney D, McGuigan K

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138.

出版信息

Inquiry. 1993 Winter;30(4):441-6.

PMID:8288406
Abstract

This study addresses whether a physician incurring small malpractice claims is predictive of large claims. This is one consideration behind reevaluating whether all claims that result in an indemnity payment should continue to be reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank, or whether claims with payments below some "floor" should be excluded. Using a claims database from 3,098 physicians for 1977-1986, both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses show that an individual having a small claim (under $30,000) is indicative of a propensity to incur large claims. This finding is robust to the cutpoint between large and small claims.

摘要

本研究探讨了发生小额医疗事故索赔的医生是否预示着会发生大额索赔。这是重新评估所有导致赔偿支付的索赔是否应继续报告给国家从业者数据库,还是应排除低于某个“下限”支付金额的索赔背后的一个考虑因素。利用1977年至1986年3098名医生的索赔数据库,横断面分析和纵向分析均表明,有小额索赔(低于3万美元)的个体具有发生大额索赔的倾向。这一发现对于大额索赔和小额索赔之间的分界点具有稳健性。

相似文献

1
Amending the National Practitioner Data Bank reporting requirements: are small claims predictive of large claims?修订国家从业者数据库报告要求:小额索赔能否预测大额索赔?
Inquiry. 1993 Winter;30(4):441-6.
2
National Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse Information on Physicians and Other Health Care Practitioners: medical malpractice payments reporting requirements--HRSA. Notice of proposed rulemaking.国家执业医师数据银行,用于收集医生及其他医疗从业者的不良信息:医疗事故赔偿报告要求——卫生资源与服务管理局。拟议规则制定通知。
Fed Regist. 1998 Dec 24;63(247):71255-7.
3
National Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse Information on Physicians and Other Health Care Practitioners; payment of fees--HRSA. Final rule.
Fed Regist. 1995 May 26;60(102):27898-9.
4
National Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse Information on Physicians and Other Health Care Practitioners: amendments to data bank regulations to comply with court order and technical correction--HRSA. Final regulations.
Fed Regist. 1994 Dec 1;59(230):61554-5.
5
National Practitioner Data Bank Guidebook Supplement.
Med Staff Couns. 1993 Spring;7(2):63-8.
6
National Practitioner Data Bank: more guidelines, more problems.
Med Staff Couns. 1993 Summer;7(3):1-9.
7
Implications of the National Practitioner Data Bank for nurse practitioners.
Nurse Pract. 1991 Aug;16(8):40, 42-3, 46.
8
Paid malpractice claims for adverse events in inpatient and outpatient settings.支付的不良事件医疗事故索赔:住院和门诊环境。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 15;305(23):2427-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.813.
9
Participation in the National Practitioner Data Bank--Department of Veterans Affairs. Final rule.参与国家从业者数据库——退伍军人事务部。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 1991 Oct 28;56(208):55461-4.
10
Missed diagnoses by urologists resulting in malpractice payment.泌尿科医生的漏诊导致医疗事故赔偿。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2537-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.040. Epub 2007 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Malpractice burden, rural location, and discontinuation of obstetric care: a study of obstetric providers in Michigan.医疗事故负担、农村地区位置与产科护理的中断:密歇根州产科医疗服务提供者的一项研究
J Rural Health. 2009 Winter;25(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00196.x.
2
Medical malpractice among physicians: who will be sued and who will pay?医生中的医疗事故:谁会被起诉,谁来赔偿?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2000 Sep;3(4):269-77. doi: 10.1023/a:1019014028914.