• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保加利亚乳杆菌D-乳酸脱氢酶的结晶

Crystallization of D-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus bulgaricus.

作者信息

Nessler S, Le Bras G, Le Bras G, Garel J R

机构信息

Laboratoire de Biologie Structurale, UMR 9920 CNRS-Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.

出版信息

J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 7;235(1):370-1. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80043-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80043-9
PMID:8289259
Abstract

The D-lactate dehydrogenase (D-LDH) from Lactobacillus bulgaricus has been purified and co-crystallized with its cofactor NAD+. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction experiments have been obtained from an ammonium sulfate solution by the hanging-drop method. The crystals belong to the orthorhombic space group C222 (or C222(1)) with cell dimensions a = 76.5 A, b = 93.3 A, c = 118.4 A and one monomer of 37,000 daltons per asymmetric unit. They diffract beyond 3.0 A resolution. Sequence comparison suggests that D-LDHs have no evolutionary relationship to L-LDHs and belong instead to the family of the D-2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenases. The X-ray crystallographic structure of the D-LDH from Lactobacillus bulgaricus will be a decisive test of this hypothesis.

摘要

保加利亚乳杆菌的D-乳酸脱氢酶(D-LDH)已被纯化,并与辅因子NAD+共结晶。通过悬滴法从硫酸铵溶液中获得了适合X射线衍射实验的晶体。这些晶体属于正交晶系空间群C222(或C222(1)),晶胞参数a = 76.5 Å,b = 93.3 Å,c = 118.4 Å,每个不对称单元有一个37,000道尔顿的单体。它们的衍射分辨率超过3.0 Å。序列比较表明,D-LDH与L-LDH没有进化关系,而是属于D-2-羟基酸脱氢酶家族。保加利亚乳杆菌D-LDH的X射线晶体结构将对这一假设进行决定性检验。

相似文献

1
Crystallization of D-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus bulgaricus.保加利亚乳杆菌D-乳酸脱氢酶的结晶
J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 7;235(1):370-1. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80043-9.
2
Cloning, expression, purification, crystallization and X-ray crystallographic analysis of D-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus jensenii.詹氏乳酸杆菌D-乳酸脱氢酶的克隆、表达、纯化、结晶及X射线晶体学分析
Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2014 Aug;70(Pt 8):1046-8. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X14012606. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
3
Properties of D-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus bulgaricus: a possible different evolutionary origin for the D- and L-lactate dehydrogenases.保加利亚乳杆菌D-乳酸脱氢酶的特性:D-和L-乳酸脱氢酶可能具有不同的进化起源
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1991 Mar 15;63(1):89-93. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(91)90533-g.
4
Crystallization and preliminary characterization of crystals of R-alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus brevis.短乳杆菌R-醇脱氢酶晶体的结晶及初步表征
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2000 Dec;56(Pt 12):1696-8. doi: 10.1107/s0907444900011860.
5
A regular 1:1 complex of two allosteric states in the single crystal of L-lactate dehydrogenase from Bifidobacterium longum.来自长双歧杆菌的L-乳酸脱氢酶单晶中两种变构状态的规则1:1复合物。
J Mol Biol. 1994 Feb 25;236(3):958-9. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1202.
6
Crystallization of allosteric L-lactate dehydrogenase from Thermus caldophilus and preliminary crystallographic data.嗜热栖热菌变构L-乳酸脱氢酶的结晶及初步晶体学数据。
J Biochem. 1991 Jan;109(1):6-7.
7
Domain closure, substrate specificity and catalysis of D-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus bulgaricus.保加利亚乳杆菌D-乳酸脱氢酶的结构域封闭、底物特异性及催化作用
J Mol Biol. 2002 Apr 19;318(1):109-19. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00086-4.
8
Insights into substrate binding by D-2-ketoacid dehydrogenases from the structure of Lactobacillus pentosus D-lactate dehydrogenase.从戊糖乳杆菌D-乳酸脱氢酶结构洞察D-2-酮酸脱氢酶的底物结合情况
Structure. 1996 Apr 15;4(4):437-47. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00049-4.
9
Crystal structure of L-2-hydroxyisocaproate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus confusus at 2.2 A resolution. An example of strong asymmetry between subunits.来自困惑乳杆菌的L-2-羟基异己酸脱氢酶在2.2埃分辨率下的晶体结构。亚基间强烈不对称的一个实例。
J Mol Biol. 1995 Aug 11;251(2):256-81. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0433.
10
Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic study of cathepsin D inhibitor from potatoes.
J Mol Biol. 1991 Mar 5;218(1):21-2. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90869-8.