Taylor J J, Rowe D, Kylefjord H, Chessells J, Katz F, Proctor S J, Middleton P G
Leukaemia Research Fund Laboratory, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Leukemia. 1994 Jan;8(1):60-6.
We have analysed the structure of the T-cell receptor gamma chain (TCRG) genes in a panel of biopsies taken from 24 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (13 cALL, one pre-B ALL, two null ALL and eight T-ALL) at presentation and at clinical relapse. In the majority of cases (18/24) the structure of these genes was concordant, but in a significant minority of cases (6/24) the TCRG genes were in a different conformation at different clinical stages. In three of these patients (one null ALL, two T-ALL) the clonal TCRG rearrangements detected at presentation were absent at relapse possibly as a result of clonal regression. In one other patient (cALL), the TCRG locus at relapse was rearranged to V genes which are located downstream of the V genes found in the presentation rearrangement. This indicates that the relapse leukemic clone is probably the result of clonal evolution. In two patients (one cALL, one T-ALL) there were no clonally dominant rearrangements of the TCRG genes at presentation, but evidence for clonal rearrangements at relapse, possibly as a result of clonal progression. The structure of the IgH genes were determined in four of the six patients with clonal changes in the TCRG genes and were found to be concordant. The changes in TCRG gene structure were not restricted to ALL of any one particular age group, phenotype or duration of first remission. These data indicate that the assignment of clonal specific markers based upon the sequence of TCRG rearrangements at presentation may not always be useful in the detection of minimal residual disease in ALL.
我们分析了24例急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者(13例普通型ALL、1例前B细胞ALL、2例无标记ALL和8例T细胞ALL)初诊及临床复发时所取活检样本中T细胞受体γ链(TCRG)基因的结构。在大多数病例(18/24)中,这些基因的结构是一致的,但在少数病例(6/24)中,TCRG基因在不同临床阶段呈不同构象。在其中3例患者(1例无标记ALL、2例T细胞ALL)中,初诊时检测到的克隆性TCRG重排在复发时消失,可能是由于克隆消退。在另一例患者(普通型ALL)中,复发时TCRG基因座重排至位于初诊重排中发现的V基因下游的V基因。这表明复发的白血病克隆可能是克隆进化的结果。在2例患者(1例普通型ALL、1例T细胞ALL)中,初诊时没有TCRG基因的克隆性优势重排,但有复发时克隆重排的证据,可能是由于克隆进展。在TCRG基因发生克隆性改变的6例患者中的4例中测定了IgH基因的结构,发现它们是一致的。TCRG基因结构的改变并不局限于任何一个特定年龄组、表型或首次缓解期的ALL。这些数据表明,基于初诊时TCRG重排序列分配克隆特异性标志物在检测ALL微小残留病时可能并不总是有用的。