Muus P, Donnelly P, Schattenberg A, Linssen P, Minderman H, Dompeling E, de Witte T
Department of Hematology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Semin Oncol. 1993 Dec;20(6 Suppl 8):47-52.
The influence of three different dosage schedules of anthracycline (idarubicin or daunorubicin)-intensified preparative therapy prior to T-cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) on (1) the severity and duration of oral toxicity (mucositis), (2) the duration of bone marrow aplasia, and (3) overall survival, relapse, and disease-free survival was studied in 99 BMT patients with standard- or high-risk hematologic malignancies. A further 146 patients who did not receive the anthracycline-intensified conditioning served as (historic) controls. All patients received cyclophosphamide (total dose, 120 mg/kg) on days -6 and -5 and total body irradiation on days -2 and -1 prior to BMT. The 99 patients who received the anthracycline-intensified preparative regimen were given either idarubicin (total dose, 42 mg/m2; n = 88) or daunorubicin (total dose, 156 mg/m2; n = 11) by continuous intravenous infusion between days -7 and -1 prior to BMT in 59 cases (cohort 1), on days -8 and -7 in 17 cases (cohort 2), and on days -12 and -11 in 23 cases (cohort 3). The occurrence of severe oral mucositis and delayed bone marrow recovery was schedule dependent, being substantially lower with earlier administration of the anthracycline-intensified regimen on days -12 and -11 before BMT (cohort 3), in comparison with later administration (cohorts 1 and 2). Plasma drug and metabolite concentrations were measured in 11 patients who received idarubicin. At the time of allogeneic bone marrow infusion (day 0), patients in cohorts 1 and 2 had plasma concentrations of idarubicin and idarubicinol (its active metabolite) in the range of in vitro cytotoxicity. However, in cohort 3, plasma concentrations on day 0 were much lower, which correlated with the lower maximum intensity and shorter duration of mucositis in these patients. In terms of overall survival, relapse rate, and disease-free survival in standard-risk patients, the anthracycline-intensified regimen proved to be very effective. Transplant-related mortality was 25% in the anthracycline group compared with 32% in the controls. The probability of relapse also was significantly less in the anthracycline group in comparison with controls (17% v 46%; P < .001), and the probabilities of long-term overall and disease-free survival were significantly greater (71% v 37% [P < .01] and 63% v 32% [P < .01], respectively). Only three patients in the idarubicin group experienced cardiotoxicity (one in each cohort); the causative relationship with anthracyclines was considered likely in one, possible in one, and doubtful in the third.
在99例患有标准风险或高风险血液系统恶性肿瘤的异基因骨髓移植(BMT)患者中,研究了三种不同剂量方案的蒽环类药物(伊达比星或柔红霉素)强化预处理疗法对以下方面的影响:(1)口腔毒性(粘膜炎)的严重程度和持续时间;(2)骨髓抑制期的持续时间;(3)总生存期、复发率和无病生存期。另外146例未接受蒽环类药物强化预处理的患者作为(历史)对照。所有患者在BMT前的第-6天和第-5天接受环磷酰胺(总剂量120mg/kg),并在第-2天和第-1天接受全身照射。接受蒽环类药物强化预处理方案的99例患者中,59例(队列1)在BMT前的第-7天至第-1天通过持续静脉输注给予伊达比星(总剂量42mg/m²;n = 88)或柔红霉素(总剂量156mg/m²;n = 11),17例(队列2)在第-8天和第-7天给予,23例(队列3)在第-12天和第-11天给予。严重口腔粘膜炎的发生和骨髓恢复延迟与给药方案有关,与较晚给药(队列1和队列2)相比,在BMT前第-12天和第-11天较早给予蒽环类药物强化方案时,发生率明显更低。对11例接受伊达比星治疗的患者进行了血浆药物和代谢物浓度测定。在异基因骨髓输注时(第0天),队列1和队列2的患者血浆伊达比星和伊达比星醇(其活性代谢物)浓度处于体外细胞毒性范围内。然而,队列3在第0天的血浆浓度要低得多,这与这些患者较低的粘膜炎最大强度和较短持续时间相关。就标准风险患者的总生存期、复发率和无病生存期而言,蒽环类药物强化方案被证明非常有效。蒽环类药物组的移植相关死亡率为25%,而对照组为32%。与对照组相比,蒽环类药物组的复发概率也显著更低(17%对46%;P <.001),长期总生存期和无病生存期的概率则显著更高(分别为71%对37% [P <.01]和63%对32% [P <.01])。伊达比星组只有3例患者出现心脏毒性(每个队列各1例);其中1例认为与蒽环类药物可能存在因果关系,1例可能有关联,第3例存疑。