Lamy T, Michelet C, Dauriac C, Grulois I, Donio P Y, Le Prisé P Y
Service d'Hématologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalier de Rennes, France.
Acta Haematol. 1993;90(3):109-13. doi: 10.1159/000204389.
We have tested the benefit of prophylaxis by intravenous systemic vancomycin among 59 neutropenic patients in a randomized trial. Vancomycin was delivered on day zero of chemotherapy until the resolution of neutropenia in the prophylactic group (vanco+). Empiric antibiotic therapy (piperacillin, ofloxacine) was identical for all patients. The number of days with fever > 38.5 degrees C was significantly higher in the control (vanco-) group than in the vanco+ group (7.4 vs. 3.7, p < 0.02). Zero gram-positive infections occurred in the vanco+ group versus 9 in the vanco- group (p < 0.002). The mean number of days of empiric antibiotic therapy was reduced in the vanco+ group (11.3 vs. 16.3, p = 0.12). However, no benefit was noted between the two groups with regard to mortality or the severity of the infections. The selection of resistant microorganisms after systemic treatment with vancomycin is of potential risk. Such a prophylactic antibiotic regimen does not seem to be justified.
我们在一项随机试验中对59例中性粒细胞减少患者进行了静脉全身应用万古霉素预防的效果测试。在预防组(vanco+)中,万古霉素于化疗第0天开始使用,直至中性粒细胞减少症缓解。所有患者的经验性抗生素治疗(哌拉西林、氧氟沙星)相同。对照组(vanco-)中发热超过38.5摄氏度的天数显著高于vanco+组(7.4天对3.7天,p<0.02)。vanco+组未发生革兰氏阳性菌感染,而vanco-组有9例(p<0.002)。vanco+组经验性抗生素治疗的平均天数减少(11.3天对16.3天,p=0.12)。然而,两组在死亡率或感染严重程度方面未观察到益处。全身应用万古霉素治疗后耐药微生物的选择存在潜在风险。这种预防性抗生素方案似乎不合理。