• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不完全性截瘫后的运动和感觉恢复

Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia.

作者信息

Waters R L, Adkins R H, Yakura J S, Sie I

机构信息

Regional Spinal Cord Injury Care System of Southern California, Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center, Downey 90242.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Jan;75(1):67-72.

PMID:8291966
Abstract

Fifty-four individuals admitted for rehabilitation with a diagnosis of incomplete paraplegia due to trauma underwent serial prospective examinations to quantify motor and sensory recovery. Motor and sensory scoring guidelines recommended by the American Spinal Injury Association were used to assess changes. Lower extremity motor scores (LEMS) differed significantly (p < .03) between groups of patients partitioned by category of initial neurologic level of injury (NLI) with the following averages at 1 month after injury: 6.8 +/- 11.3 above T12, 15.0 +/- 8.2 at T12 and 18.3 +/- 11.4 below T12. However, the amount of motor recovery was independent of the NLI with the differences between the NLI groups remaining essentially constant from 1 month to 2 years. While the LEMS increased significantly (p < .001) an average of 11.9 +/- 8.7 points between 1 month and 1 year, the annualized rate of motor recovery rapidly declined in the first 6 months and then subsequently plateaued. All patients having a 1-month LEMS greater than 10 points (28 cases) with hip flexion or knee extension strength > or = 2/5 were able to ambulate in the community with a reciprocal gait pattern using crutches and orthoses at 1-year follow-up.

摘要

54名因创伤导致不完全性截瘫而入院接受康复治疗的患者接受了系列前瞻性检查,以量化运动和感觉恢复情况。采用美国脊髓损伤协会推荐的运动和感觉评分指南来评估变化。根据初始神经损伤水平(NLI)类别划分的患者组之间,下肢运动评分(LEMS)存在显著差异(p <.03),受伤后1个月时的平均值如下:T12以上为6.8 +/- 11.3,T12处为15.0 +/- 8.2,T12以下为18.3 +/- 11.4。然而,运动恢复量与NLI无关,NLI组之间的差异从1个月到2年基本保持不变。虽然LEMS在1个月至1年之间平均显著增加(p <.001)11.9 +/- 8.7分,但运动恢复的年化率在前6个月迅速下降,随后趋于平稳。所有1个月时LEMS大于10分(28例)且髋部屈曲或膝关节伸展力量≥2/5的患者在1年随访时能够使用拐杖和矫形器以交互步态模式在社区中行走。

相似文献

1
Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia.不完全性截瘫后的运动和感觉恢复
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Jan;75(1):67-72.
2
Recovery following complete paraplegia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Sep;73(9):784-9.
3
Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia.完全性四肢瘫后的运动和感觉恢复。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Mar;74(3):242-7.
4
Muscle force and gait performance: relationships after spinal cord injury.肌肉力量与步态表现:脊髓损伤后的关系
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Sep;87(9):1218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.024.
5
Motor recovery of patients presenting with motor paralysis and sensory sparing following cervical spinal cord injuries.
Paraplegia. 1995 Sep;33(9):506-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.1995.110.
6
Profiles of spinal cord injury and recovery after gunshot injury.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Jun(267):14-21.
7
Comparison of lower extremity motor score parameters for patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury using gait parameters.比较下肢运动评分参数与使用步态参数的运动不完全性脊髓损伤患者。
Spinal Cord. 2011 Apr;49(4):529-33. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.158. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
8
Functional skills after spinal cord injury rehabilitation: three-year longitudinal follow-up.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 Feb;69(2):111-4.
9
The role of sensory and motor evoked potentials in the prognosis of Pott's paraplegia.感觉和运动诱发电位在波状热截瘫预后中的作用。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;115(10):2267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.05.013.
10
The effect of polytrauma as a possible confounder in the outcome of monotraumatic vs polytraumatic paraplegic patients: a clinical cohort study.多发伤作为单发性创伤与多发性创伤性截瘫患者结局的混杂因素的影响:一项临床队列研究。
Spinal Cord. 2011 Jun;49(6):721-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.181. Epub 2011 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel reconstruction model for thoracic spinal cord injury in swine.一种新型猪胸段脊髓损伤重建模型。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0308637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308637. eCollection 2024.
2
Efficacy of Walking Adaptability Training on Walking Capacity in Ambulatory People With Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.步行适应性训练对运动功能不完全性脊髓损伤步行能力的疗效:多中心实用随机对照试验。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024 Jun;38(6):413-424. doi: 10.1177/15459683241248088. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
3
Effect on functional outcome of robotic assisted rehabilitation versus conventional rehabilitation in patients with complete spinal cord injury: a prospective comparative study.
机器人辅助康复与常规康复对完全性脊髓损伤患者功能结局的影响:一项前瞻性对比研究。
Spinal Cord. 2024 May;62(5):228-236. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-00970-1. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
The relationship between balance control and thigh muscle strength and muscle activity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury.平衡控制与股四头肌力量和肌肉活动在不完全性脊髓损伤患者中的关系。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2024 Feb 28;10(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41394-024-00620-x.
5
Communicating Standing and Walking Data after Spinal Cord Injury: A Patient-Engaged, Qualitative Study.脊髓损伤后站立和行走数据的交流:一项以患者为中心的定性研究。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2023 Fall;29(Suppl):1-14. doi: 10.46292/sci23-00019S. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
6
Interrater reliability of the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool for spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤站立和行走评估工具的评定者间信度。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Oct;61(10):556-561. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00921-2. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
7
Orthotic walking outcome of persons with motor complete low thoracic spinal cord injury-a retrospective study.运动完全性胸段低位脊髓损伤患者的矫形步行结果——一项回顾性研究
Spinal Cord. 2023 Mar;61(3):224-230. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00875-5. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
8
Validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury.2 分钟步行测试在脊髓损伤个体中的有效性和可靠性。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Jan;61(1):15-21. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00847-1. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
9
Validity and responsiveness of the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool for sub-acute traumatic spinal cord injury.亚急性创伤性脊髓损伤站立与行走评估工具的效度和反应性
Spinal Cord. 2022 Dec;60(12):1108-1114. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00830-w. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
10
Improving outcomes for care partners of persons with traumatic brain injury: Protocol for a randomized control trial of a just-in-time-adaptive self-management intervention.改善创伤性脑损伤患者护理者的结局:一项即时自适应自我管理干预的随机对照试验方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0268726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268726. eCollection 2022.