Burns J W, Hutt J, Weidner G
Department of Psychology, University of Health Sciences/Chicago Medical School.
Behav Med. 1993 Fall;19(3):122-8. doi: 10.1080/08964289.1993.9935181.
According to the Job Strain Model, high demand/low decision latitude jobs may be associated with increased risk of developing coronary heart disease. In further analyses of a laboratory study, the authors hypothesized that Type A behavior and/or hostility moderate the effects of demand, decision latitude, and gender on cardiovascular reactivity, a putative mechanism for the development of coronary disease. With multiple regressions, it was found that scores on the Framingham Type A scale interacted with demand and decision latitude to affect diastolic blood pressure changes, such that Type Bs in the low demand/high decision latitude condition showed the smallest increases in diastolic blood pressure. Among men, hostility accounted significantly and positively for variance in systolic blood pressure changes in addition to that accounted for by high demand. These results suggest that coronary-prone traits may potentiate, or add to, the effects that stressful environments have on health outcomes.
根据工作压力模型,高要求/低决策自由度的工作可能与患冠心病风险增加有关。在对一项实验室研究的进一步分析中,作者假设A型行为和/或敌意会调节需求、决策自由度和性别对心血管反应性的影响,而心血管反应性是冠心病发病的一种假定机制。通过多元回归分析发现,弗雷明汉A型量表得分与需求和决策自由度相互作用,影响舒张压变化,以至于在低需求/高决策自由度条件下的B型人格者舒张压升高幅度最小。在男性中,除了高需求所导致的收缩压变化差异外,敌意对收缩压变化差异也有显著的正向影响。这些结果表明,易患冠心病的特质可能会增强压力环境对健康结果的影响,或者加剧这种影响。