Dixon A K, Wheeler T K, Lomas D J, Mackenzie R
Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge.
Clin Radiol. 1993 Dec;48(6):371-6. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81103-1.
Fifty-eight patients presenting with axillary symptoms (pain, oedema, etc) following radiation therapy for breast carcinoma were randomized to be investigated by either computed tomography (CT: 29 patients) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI: 28). The objectives of the study were to compare the efficacy of the two tests in identifying the presence of tumour and their effectiveness as judged by quality of life (QOL) outcome measurements. Both tests proved efficacious; the predictive values for a positive result (tumour present) were 100% for both tests; the predictive values for negative findings were in the range of 76 to 90% for CT and 81 to 100% for MRI. As regards outcome, complete QOL data were available in 37 patients (17 of these patients had CT, 20 MRI). Although the mean change in QOL over 6 months was slightly more favourable in the patients investigated by MRI than in the CT group, the difference did not reach statistical significance.
58例乳腺癌放疗后出现腋窝症状(疼痛、水肿等)的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受计算机断层扫描(CT:29例患者)或磁共振成像(MRI:28例患者)检查。本研究的目的是比较这两种检查在识别肿瘤存在方面的效果,以及根据生活质量(QOL)结果测量来判断它们的有效性。两种检查均被证明有效;两种检查对阳性结果(存在肿瘤)的预测值均为100%;CT对阴性结果的预测值在76%至90%之间,MRI对阴性结果的预测值在81%至100%之间。至于结果,37例患者(其中17例接受CT检查,20例接受MRI检查)可获得完整的QOL数据。尽管在6个月内,接受MRI检查的患者QOL的平均变化比CT组略好,但差异未达到统计学意义。