Suppr超能文献

[传统胸部X线摄影中的物理均匀化及屏-片组合的选择]

[Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].

作者信息

Roversi R, Castaldini L, Guidarelli G

机构信息

Servizio di Radiologia Diagnostica, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna.

出版信息

Radiol Med. 1993 Dec;86(6):885-92.

PMID:8296012
Abstract

The homogenization of conventional chest radiographs is obtained with mechanical filtration of the X-ray beam and it allows opacity compensation of the different anatomical structures under examination; consequently, more pieces of diagnostic information on the mediastinum can be obtained. The authors used a mechanical device for equalization (Tau-Gil, Gilardoni SpA) with five different X-ray film/rare-earth screen combinations (3M Trimax) to investigate the following problems: a) choice of the best film-screen combination; b) results of the dosimetric comparison of filtered and non-filtered examinations; c) qualitative evaluation of equalization in terms of diagnostic information. One thousand analogic chest studies, 500 with and 500 without hard-filtering equalization, were performed with high-tension technique and statistically evaluated with a dedicated program. The authors concluded that: 1) the best qualitative results are obtained with GTU film/T6 screen combination, which seems to make the most satisfying compromise between sensitivity and spatial resolution and allows low X-ray exposure to be combined with good diagnostic results; 2) dosimetric tests clearly show that in hard-filtered studies the average incident dose to the patient is 12% lower than that given with no filter. Particularly, skin and lung doses decrease, while mediastinum dose doubles to allow the simultaneous visualization of mediastinum and parenchyma; 3) a substantial difference exists between the frequencies of excellent, good and bad results in the comparative series (with and without equalization) for the evaluation of central chest areas, especially for mediastinum, retrocardiac region and carena. The overall rate of poor results was reduced by equalization, ranging 11.6% to 2.8% (mean: 6.3%) in equalized studies, and topping 64.2% (average: 35.5%) in non-equalized studies. Therefore, in the authors' experience, equalization with this type of mechanical device improves the depiction of the mediastinal region, with no significant imaging loss in lung parenchyma demonstration. Moreover, hard-filtering decreases average incident dose to the chest and skin-lung dose, increasing mediastinum dose to allow its correct demonstration.

摘要

通过对X射线束进行机械过滤可实现传统胸部X光片的均匀化,这能对受检的不同解剖结构的不透明度进行补偿;因此,可以获得更多关于纵隔的诊断信息。作者使用了一种均衡机械设备(Tau-Gil,吉拉尔多尼股份公司)和五种不同的X光胶片/稀土增感屏组合(3M Trimax)来研究以下问题:a)最佳胶片-增感屏组合的选择;b)过滤和未过滤检查的剂量学比较结果;c)从诊断信息角度对均衡的定性评估。采用高压技术进行了1000例模拟胸部检查,其中500例进行了硬过滤均衡,500例未进行,并用一个专门程序进行了统计评估。作者得出结论:1)使用GTU胶片/T6增感屏组合可获得最佳定性结果,该组合似乎在灵敏度和空间分辨率之间达成了最令人满意的折衷,并且能在低X射线照射下取得良好的诊断结果;2)剂量学测试清楚地表明,在硬过滤检查中,患者的平均入射剂量比未使用过滤器时低12%。特别是,皮肤和肺部剂量降低,而纵隔剂量加倍,以便能同时显示纵隔和实质;3)在比较系列(有和没有均衡)中,评估胸部中央区域,特别是纵隔、心后区域和气管时,优秀、良好和差结果的频率存在显著差异。通过均衡,差结果的总体发生率降低,在均衡研究中为11.6%至2.8%(平均:6.3%),在未均衡研究中高达64.2%(平均:35.5%)。因此,根据作者的经验,使用这种类型的机械设备进行均衡可改善纵隔区域的显示,在肺实质显示方面不会有明显的成像损失。此外,硬过滤降低了胸部和皮肤-肺部的平均入射剂量,增加了纵隔剂量以使其能正确显示。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验