Ben Ahmeida E T, Gregoriadis G, Potter C W, Jennings R
Department of Experimental and Clinical Microbiology, University of Sheffield Medical School, UK.
Vaccine. 1993 Oct;11(13):1302-9. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(93)90099-j.
The immunogenicity and protective efficacy of an influenza A subunit vaccine preparation administered to mice in an aqueous form, or presented as immunostimulatory complexes (ISCOMs), liposomes or with Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA), were assessed in comparative studies with live infectious virus. Both intranasal and parenteral routes of administration were assessed. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure nasal wash and serum antibody responses in groups of unprimed mice, while protection was determined by the recovery of homologous influenza virus from mouse nasal washes and lung homogenates following challenge infection by the intranasal route. The results showed that parenteral administration of the influenza antigen preparations induced variable levels of both local and systemic antibodies at weeks 3, 7 and 22 postimmunization. Although the overall greatest levels of antibody and protection were elicited in mice following live virus infection, formulation of influenza surface haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) proteins into ISCOMs elicited high and persistent antibody responses and provided relatively good protection of the upper and lower respiratory tracts of these animals. The results also show a relatively poor effect of the subunit antigen preparations in promoting humoral immune responses and protection irrespective of the nature of their presentation, when given by the intranasal route.
在与活感染病毒的对比研究中,评估了以水性形式给予小鼠的甲型流感亚单位疫苗制剂、或作为免疫刺激复合物(ISCOM)、脂质体或与弗氏完全佐剂(FCA)一起呈现时的免疫原性和保护效力。评估了鼻内和肠胃外给药途径。使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)来测量未致敏小鼠组中的鼻洗液和血清抗体反应,而通过在鼻内途径进行攻击感染后从小鼠鼻洗液和肺匀浆中回收同源流感病毒来确定保护情况。结果表明,在免疫后第3、7和22周,肠胃外给予流感抗原制剂诱导了不同水平的局部和全身抗体。虽然在活病毒感染后的小鼠中引发了总体上最大水平的抗体和保护,但将流感表面血凝素(HA)和神经氨酸酶(NA)蛋白制成ISCOM引发了高且持久的抗体反应,并为这些动物的上呼吸道和下呼吸道提供了相对良好的保护。结果还显示,当通过鼻内途径给药时,无论其呈现形式如何,亚单位抗原制剂在促进体液免疫反应和保护方面的效果相对较差。