• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种用于诊断躯体化障碍的诊断系统的比较。

Comparison of four diagnostic systems for the diagnosis of somatization disorder.

作者信息

Tómasson K, Kent D, Coryell W

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, National University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Nov;88(5):311-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03465.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03465.x
PMID:8296574
Abstract

This article compares the Feighner criteria, the DSM-III criteria for somatization disorder and a modified version of the proposed ICD-10 criteria. Working with a data set collected from the charts of 250 patients considered likely to have unexplained somatic symptoms, the kappa statistic and percentage agreement was calculated. The kappa between the DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria is 0.93. Between the modified ICD-10 and DSM-III it was 0.71, but between Feighner and the modified ICD-10 it was 0.44. However, the different criteria identify the same patient population based on mental co-morbidity and demographics. The authors suggest that the modified version of the proposed ICD-10 should be investigated further, as it can use data sets previously collected for assessments of somatization disorder.

摘要

本文比较了费伊纳标准、躯体化障碍的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)标准以及拟议的《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)标准的修订版。利用从250名被认为可能有无法解释的躯体症状的患者病历中收集的数据集,计算了kappa统计量和百分比一致性。DSM-III与DSM-III-R标准之间的kappa值为0.93。修订后的ICD-10与DSM-III之间为0.71,但费伊纳标准与修订后的ICD-10之间为0.44。然而,不同的标准基于精神共病和人口统计学特征识别出相同的患者群体。作者建议,应进一步研究拟议的ICD-10修订版,因为它可以使用先前收集的用于评估躯体化障碍的数据集。

相似文献

1
Comparison of four diagnostic systems for the diagnosis of somatization disorder.四种用于诊断躯体化障碍的诊断系统的比较。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Nov;88(5):311-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03465.x.
2
Further evidence for a broader concept of somatization disorder using the somatic symptom index.使用躯体症状指数对躯体化障碍更广泛概念的进一步证据。
Psychosomatics. 1995 May-Jun;36(3):285-94. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(95)71668-1.
3
Diagnostic concordance in primary care somatization disorder.基层医疗中躯体化障碍的诊断一致性
Psychosomatics. 1991 Spring;32(2):191-5.
4
Somatization and conversion disorders: comorbidity and demographics at presentation.躯体化障碍和转换障碍:就诊时的共病情况及人口统计学特征。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Sep;84(3):288-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03146.x.
5
The classification of multiple somatoform symptoms.多种躯体形式症状的分类
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996 Nov;184(11):680-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199611000-00005.
6
Comparison of Composite International Diagnostic Interview and clinical DSM-III-R criteria checklist diagnoses.《复合性国际诊断访谈》与临床《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版标准清单诊断结果的比较
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992 Jun;85(6):440-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb03208.x.
7
[Hysteria, dissociation and conversion. A review of concepts, classification and diagnostic instruments].[癔症、分离障碍与转换障碍。概念、分类及诊断工具综述]
Psychiatr Prax. 1996 Mar;23(2):63-8.
8
Somatization in primary care: pattern and correlates in a clinic in Nigeria.初级保健中的躯体化:尼日利亚一家诊所的模式及相关因素
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992 Sep;86(3):223-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb03256.x.
9
Clinical utility of DSM-IV pain disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版疼痛障碍的临床效用
Compr Psychiatry. 1999 Sep-Oct;40(5):353-7. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(99)90140-2.
10
The symptom structure of panic attacks.惊恐发作的症状结构。
Compr Psychiatry. 1994 Sep-Oct;35(5):349-53. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(94)90274-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Othmer and DeSouza test for screening of somatisation disorder: is it useful in general practice?用于筛查躯体化障碍的奥思默和德索萨测试:在全科医疗中有用吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Mar;51(464):182-6.